Exploratory study on quantitative assessment of skin hardness in patients with systemic sclerosis using SOFTGRAM.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hiraku Kokubu, Yasuaki Ikuno, Kazuyuki Uchiyama, Miwa Kato, Mayuka Yamamoto, Haruki Asada, Satona Rikitake, Yoshimichi Kobayashi, Yudai Tsukamoto, Takahiro Koike, Syuji Sugiura, Yasuhiro Maeda, Takuma Hayami, Kensuke Yoneta, Toshifumi Takahashi, Bunpei Yamamoto, Takeshi Kato, Yoshito Kunisaki, Makoto Nakatani, Kohei Okamoto, Noriki Fujimoto
{"title":"Exploratory study on quantitative assessment of skin hardness in patients with systemic sclerosis using SOFTGRAM.","authors":"Hiraku Kokubu, Yasuaki Ikuno, Kazuyuki Uchiyama, Miwa Kato, Mayuka Yamamoto, Haruki Asada, Satona Rikitake, Yoshimichi Kobayashi, Yudai Tsukamoto, Takahiro Koike, Syuji Sugiura, Yasuhiro Maeda, Takuma Hayami, Kensuke Yoneta, Toshifumi Takahashi, Bunpei Yamamoto, Takeshi Kato, Yoshito Kunisaki, Makoto Nakatani, Kohei Okamoto, Noriki Fujimoto","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/6z4e7m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is a lack of quantitative and objective methods for measuring skin hardness. This study aimed to verify whether SOFTGRAM, a device that can measure elastic modulus using the Hertz elastic contact theory, could be used to evaluate skin hardness in systemic sclerosis (SSc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skin score according to the modified Rodnan total skin thickness score and elastic modulus of the skin using SOFTGRAM were measured for 20 patients with SSc and 20 healthy controls on 8 parts of the body, both of the cheeks, forearms, fingers, and hands. Five observers shared to measure skin score 320 times (40 participants × 8 parts). Elastic modulus was measured 1600 times (40 participants × 8 parts × 5 times each). As an additional examination to compare differences between observers, the skin score of another healthy control was measured 40 times (5 observers × 8 parts). Elastic modulus was measured 200 times (5 observers × 8 parts × 5 times each).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant correlation between elastic modulus and skin score (correlation coefficient=0.67, p<0.001) and a significant difference in elastic modulus (8 parts: healthy controls vs. limited cutaneous SSc vs. diffuse cutaneous SSc: 22.6±15.7 vs. 32.0±27.7 vs. 44.8±39.8, p<0.001). Intraobserver reliabilities were sufficient in 6 out of 7 observers; however, interobserver was less satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed the practicality of SOFTGRAM as an accurate measurement method of skin hardness but also revealed points to be improved. More studies are needed to find an accurate measurement method of skin hardness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/6z4e7m","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is a lack of quantitative and objective methods for measuring skin hardness. This study aimed to verify whether SOFTGRAM, a device that can measure elastic modulus using the Hertz elastic contact theory, could be used to evaluate skin hardness in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods: Skin score according to the modified Rodnan total skin thickness score and elastic modulus of the skin using SOFTGRAM were measured for 20 patients with SSc and 20 healthy controls on 8 parts of the body, both of the cheeks, forearms, fingers, and hands. Five observers shared to measure skin score 320 times (40 participants × 8 parts). Elastic modulus was measured 1600 times (40 participants × 8 parts × 5 times each). As an additional examination to compare differences between observers, the skin score of another healthy control was measured 40 times (5 observers × 8 parts). Elastic modulus was measured 200 times (5 observers × 8 parts × 5 times each).

Results: There was a significant correlation between elastic modulus and skin score (correlation coefficient=0.67, p<0.001) and a significant difference in elastic modulus (8 parts: healthy controls vs. limited cutaneous SSc vs. diffuse cutaneous SSc: 22.6±15.7 vs. 32.0±27.7 vs. 44.8±39.8, p<0.001). Intraobserver reliabilities were sufficient in 6 out of 7 observers; however, interobserver was less satisfactory.

Conclusions: This study showed the practicality of SOFTGRAM as an accurate measurement method of skin hardness but also revealed points to be improved. More studies are needed to find an accurate measurement method of skin hardness.

SOFTGRAM定量评估系统性硬化症患者皮肤硬度的探索性研究。
目的:目前缺乏定量和客观的方法来测量皮肤硬度。本研究旨在验证可以使用赫兹弹性接触理论测量弹性模量的装置SOFTGRAM,方法:采用改良的Rodnan皮肤总厚度评分和SOFTGRAM软件对20例系统性硬化症患者和20名健康对照者的脸颊、前臂、手指和手部8个部位的皮肤弹性模量进行测量。五名观察者共测量皮肤评分320次(40名参与者×8个部分)。弹性模量测量1600次(40名参与者×8个部分×5次)。作为比较观察者之间差异的额外检查,另一个健康对照的皮肤评分被测量了40次(5个观察者×8个部分)。弹性模量测量200次(5名观察者×8份×5次)。结果:弹性模量与皮肤评分之间存在显著相关性(相关系数=0.67,P结论:本研究显示了SOFTGRAM作为一种精确测量皮肤硬度的方法的实用性,但也揭示了需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信