Proton Pump Inhibitors and Hyporesponsiveness to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients: Results from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1159/000534701
Akio Nakashima, Yoshia Miyawaki, Hirotaka Komaba, Noriaki Kurita, Yoshihiro Onishi, Takashi Yokoo, Masafumi Fukagawa
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitors and Hyporesponsiveness to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients: Results from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.","authors":"Akio Nakashima, Yoshia Miyawaki, Hirotaka Komaba, Noriaki Kurita, Yoshihiro Onishi, Takashi Yokoo, Masafumi Fukagawa","doi":"10.1159/000534701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) is important problem in dialysis patients. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may inhibit iron absorption, few studies have examined associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. This study examined the associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was a cross-sectional study using repeated 4-month observations, up to eight observations/patient, from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (J-DOPPS). The primary outcome was erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). ESA dose, hemoglobin, proportion of erythropoietin-resistant anemia, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin were also examined. Linear or risk-difference regression models were used with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,644 patients, 867 patients had PPI prescriptions (52.7%). Patients prescribed PPI had higher ERI, higher ESA dose, and lower TSAT levels. Multivariable analysis for 12,048 four-month observations showed significantly greater ERI in PPI users (adjusted difference 0.95 IU/week/kg/[g/dL] [95% CI: 0.40-1.50]). Significant differences were also found in ESA dose (336 IU/week [95% CI: 70-602]) and the prevalence of erythropoietin-resistant anemia (3.9% [2.0-5.8%]) even after adjusted for TSAT and ferritin. Among possible mediators between the association of PPIs and anemia, TSAT was significantly different between PPI users and non-users (adjusted difference, -0.82% [95% CI: -1.56 to -0.07]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed the associations between PPI and ERI, ESA dose, and TSAT in hemodialysis patients; physicians should consider anemia's associations with PPIs in hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) is important problem in dialysis patients. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may inhibit iron absorption, few studies have examined associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. This study examined the associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional study using repeated 4-month observations, up to eight observations/patient, from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (J-DOPPS). The primary outcome was erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). ESA dose, hemoglobin, proportion of erythropoietin-resistant anemia, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin were also examined. Linear or risk-difference regression models were used with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements.

Results: Of 1,644 patients, 867 patients had PPI prescriptions (52.7%). Patients prescribed PPI had higher ERI, higher ESA dose, and lower TSAT levels. Multivariable analysis for 12,048 four-month observations showed significantly greater ERI in PPI users (adjusted difference 0.95 IU/week/kg/[g/dL] [95% CI: 0.40-1.50]). Significant differences were also found in ESA dose (336 IU/week [95% CI: 70-602]) and the prevalence of erythropoietin-resistant anemia (3.9% [2.0-5.8%]) even after adjusted for TSAT and ferritin. Among possible mediators between the association of PPIs and anemia, TSAT was significantly different between PPI users and non-users (adjusted difference, -0.82% [95% CI: -1.56 to -0.07]).

Conclusions: This study showed the associations between PPI and ERI, ESA dose, and TSAT in hemodialysis patients; physicians should consider anemia's associations with PPIs in hemodialysis patients.

血液透析患者的质子泵抑制剂和对红细胞生成刺激剂的低反应性:来自日本透析结果和实践模式研究的结果。
引言:对红细胞生成刺激剂(ESA)的低反应性是透析患者的一个重要问题。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)可能抑制铁吸收,但很少有研究检测质子泵抑制剂与血液透析患者的ESA抵抗性贫血之间的关系。本研究探讨了血液透析患者PPIs与ESA抵抗性贫血之间的关系。方法:本研究是一项横断面研究,使用日本透析结果和实践模式研究(J-DOPPS)的4个月重复观察,每个患者最多8次观察。主要结果是红细胞生成素抵抗指数(ERI)。还检查了ESA剂量、血红蛋白、红细胞生成素抵抗性贫血的比例、转铁蛋白饱和度(TSAT)和铁蛋白。线性或风险差回归模型与广义估计方程一起使用,以说明重复测量。结果:1644名患者中,867名患者(52.7%)开具了PPI处方。开具PPI处方的患者ERI较高,ESA剂量较高,TSAT水平较低。对12048个四个月观察结果的多变量分析显示,PPI使用者的ERI明显更高(调整后的差异为0.95 IU/周/kg/(g/dl)(95%CI 0.40至1.50))。即使在调整TSAT和铁蛋白后,ESA剂量(336 IU/周(95%CI 70至602)和红细胞生成素抵抗性贫血的患病率(3.9%(2.0%至5.8%))也存在显著差异。在PPI与贫血之间的可能介质中,TSAT在PPI使用者和非使用者之间存在显著差异(校正后差异为-0.82%(95%CI,-1.56至-0.07))。结论本研究显示了血液透析患者PPI与ERI、ESA剂量和TSAT之间的关联;医生应考虑血液透析患者贫血与PPIs的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信