Patient Perception and Impact of Home Test Kits on Health Care Utilization for Urinary Tract Infection.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Population Health Management Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1089/pop.2023.0201
Sarah J Billups, Danielle Fixen, Kaci Johnson, Sara A Wettergreen, Lisa M Schilling
{"title":"Patient Perception and Impact of Home Test Kits on Health Care Utilization for Urinary Tract Infection.","authors":"Sarah J Billups, Danielle Fixen, Kaci Johnson, Sara A Wettergreen, Lisa M Schilling","doi":"10.1089/pop.2023.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) utilization that could potentially be treated by a primary care provider (PCP). This study assessed patient perceived value of a home UTI test kit plus educational materials and its impact on ED utilization for a UTI symptom episode. Women aged 18-75 years with Medicaid insurance and a history of 1-3 uncomplicated UTIs in the past year were prospectively identified and randomized to the intervention, intervention plus (intervention plus a patient portal message before its delivery), or standard of care group. A telephone survey was conducted 3-5 months after the mailing. Site of care for each UTI symptom episode was measured 12 months before and 6 months after the intervention. Test kit packages were mailed to 266 intervention individuals, and 150 responded to the telephone survey. Utilization outcomes were compared between a combined intervention group and a control group. Approximately one-third of the intervention patients experienced UTI symptoms within 5 months, and 73% used the test kit. Of those who experienced UTI symptoms, 58% contacted their PCP to seek care and 96% reported that the test kit was helpful. ED utilization was not significantly different in the intervention groups before and after the intervention, nor between the intervention and control groups postintervention. A home UTI test kit plus educational materials mailed to patients with a history of uncomplicated UTI was deemed helpful but did not have a measurable impact on ED utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) utilization that could potentially be treated by a primary care provider (PCP). This study assessed patient perceived value of a home UTI test kit plus educational materials and its impact on ED utilization for a UTI symptom episode. Women aged 18-75 years with Medicaid insurance and a history of 1-3 uncomplicated UTIs in the past year were prospectively identified and randomized to the intervention, intervention plus (intervention plus a patient portal message before its delivery), or standard of care group. A telephone survey was conducted 3-5 months after the mailing. Site of care for each UTI symptom episode was measured 12 months before and 6 months after the intervention. Test kit packages were mailed to 266 intervention individuals, and 150 responded to the telephone survey. Utilization outcomes were compared between a combined intervention group and a control group. Approximately one-third of the intervention patients experienced UTI symptoms within 5 months, and 73% used the test kit. Of those who experienced UTI symptoms, 58% contacted their PCP to seek care and 96% reported that the test kit was helpful. ED utilization was not significantly different in the intervention groups before and after the intervention, nor between the intervention and control groups postintervention. A home UTI test kit plus educational materials mailed to patients with a history of uncomplicated UTI was deemed helpful but did not have a measurable impact on ED utilization.

家庭检测试剂盒对尿路感染卫生保健利用的患者认知和影响。
尿路感染(UTI)是急诊科(ED)使用的常见原因,初级保健提供者(PCP)可能会对其进行治疗。本研究评估了患者对家庭尿路感染检测试剂盒和教育材料的感知价值及其对尿路感染症状发作ED利用率的影响。前瞻性地确定18-75岁有医疗补助保险且在过去一年中有1-3例无并发症尿路感染史的女性,并将其随机分为干预组、干预+组(干预+患者分娩前的门户信息)或标准护理组。邮件寄出后3-5个月进行了电话调查。在干预前12个月和干预后6个月测量每个UTI症状发作的护理部位。向266名干预人员邮寄了检测试剂盒,150人对电话调查做出了回应。比较联合干预组和对照组的使用结果。大约三分之一的干预患者在5个月内出现尿路感染症状,73%的患者使用了检测试剂盒。在那些出现尿路感染症状的人中,58%的人联系了他们的PCP寻求治疗,96%的人报告说检测试剂盒很有帮助。干预组在干预前后ED利用率没有显著差异,干预后干预组和对照组之间也没有显著差异。家庭尿路感染检测试剂盒加上邮寄给有无复杂尿路感染史的患者的教育材料被认为是有帮助的,但对ED的利用率没有可衡量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信