Gender perspective in psoriasis: a scoping review and proposal of strategies for improved clinical practice by European dermatologists.

Q2 Medicine
International Journal of Women''s Dermatology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1097/JW9.0000000000000112
Alvaro Gonzalez-Cantero, María Magdalena Constantin, Annunziata Dattola, Tom Hillary, Elise Kleyn, Nina Magnolo
{"title":"Gender perspective in psoriasis: a scoping review and proposal of strategies for improved clinical practice by European dermatologists.","authors":"Alvaro Gonzalez-Cantero, María Magdalena Constantin, Annunziata Dattola, Tom Hillary, Elise Kleyn, Nina Magnolo","doi":"10.1097/JW9.0000000000000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of psoriasis is similar between men and women; however, evidence exists of sex- and gender-related differences in disease expression, impact, coping, and needs of patients with psoriasis. These differences are essential and should be considered in clinical practice and research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compile available evidence on sex- and gender-related differences in psoriasis, identify the most critical gaps in clinical practice and research, and use it to propose strategies for improved clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six European dermatologists selected the topics to consider according to their relevance in the dermatology setting with the support of methodologists. Evidence on sex- and gender-related differences was obtained by a scoping review based on search strategies in Medline and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 using the following terms: arthritis, psoriatic, psoriasis, gender, and sex. The panel discussed the results and proposed strategies by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scoping review identified broad themes: (1) clinical expression, (2) severity and patient-reported outcomes, (3) psychosocial impact, (4) access to treatments and propensity to treat, (5) comorbidities, and (6) treatment effect. The strategies are based on these broad themes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>No risk of bias assessment was done due to the scoping nature of the review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review offers insights into gender differences in psoriasis, providing a foundation for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53478,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology","volume":"9 4","pages":"e112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of psoriasis is similar between men and women; however, evidence exists of sex- and gender-related differences in disease expression, impact, coping, and needs of patients with psoriasis. These differences are essential and should be considered in clinical practice and research.

Objective: To compile available evidence on sex- and gender-related differences in psoriasis, identify the most critical gaps in clinical practice and research, and use it to propose strategies for improved clinical practice.

Methods: Six European dermatologists selected the topics to consider according to their relevance in the dermatology setting with the support of methodologists. Evidence on sex- and gender-related differences was obtained by a scoping review based on search strategies in Medline and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 using the following terms: arthritis, psoriatic, psoriasis, gender, and sex. The panel discussed the results and proposed strategies by consensus.

Results: The scoping review identified broad themes: (1) clinical expression, (2) severity and patient-reported outcomes, (3) psychosocial impact, (4) access to treatments and propensity to treat, (5) comorbidities, and (6) treatment effect. The strategies are based on these broad themes.

Limitations: No risk of bias assessment was done due to the scoping nature of the review.

Conclusion: This review offers insights into gender differences in psoriasis, providing a foundation for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

银屑病的性别观点:欧洲皮肤科医生对改善临床实践策略的范围审查和建议。
背景:银屑病的患病率在男性和女性之间相似;然而,有证据表明银屑病患者在疾病表达、影响、应对和需求方面存在性别和性别相关的差异。这些差异是至关重要的,应该在临床实践和研究中加以考虑。目的:收集银屑病性别和性别相关差异的现有证据,找出临床实践和研究中最关键的差距,并利用这些差距提出改进临床实践的策略。方法:六名欧洲皮肤科医生在方法学家的支持下,根据其在皮肤科环境中的相关性选择了要考虑的主题。从成立到2021年10月,基于Medline和Cochrane图书馆的搜索策略,通过范围界定审查获得了性别和性别相关差异的证据,使用了以下术语:关节炎、银屑病、银屑病、性别和性别。小组以协商一致方式讨论了结果并提出了战略建议。结果:范围界定审查确定了广泛的主题:(1)临床表现,(2)严重程度和患者报告的结果,(3)心理社会影响,(4)获得治疗的机会和治疗倾向,(5)合并症,以及(6)治疗效果。这些战略基于这些广泛的主题。局限性:由于审查的范围界定性质,没有进行偏见评估的风险。结论:这篇综述为银屑病的性别差异提供了见解,为改善临床实践和患者预后提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJWD publishes articles pertaining to dermatologic medical, surgical and cosmetic issues faced by female patients and their families. We are interested in original research articles, review articles, unusual case reports, new treatments, clinical trials, education, mentorship and viewpoint articles. Articles dealing with ethical issues in dermatology and medical legal scenarios are also welcome.Very important articles will have accompanying editorials. Topics which our subsections editors look forward to welcoming include: Women’s Health Oncology, Surgery and Aesthetics Pediatric Dermatology Medical Dermatology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信