Interference screw versus suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer: a biomechanical analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Zachary Meyer, Daniel Bohl, Jacob Zide, William Pierce, Brad Niese, Claire Shivers, Jordan Polk, Yassine Kannan, Anthony I Riccio
{"title":"Interference screw versus suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer: a biomechanical analysis.","authors":"Zachary Meyer, Daniel Bohl, Jacob Zide, William Pierce, Brad Niese, Claire Shivers, Jordan Polk, Yassine Kannan, Anthony I Riccio","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) transfer to the lateral cuneiform is commonly utilized to treat dynamic supination for relapsed clubfoot deformity. Traditional suture button fixation (SBF) may lead to skin necrosis at the button/skin interface. While interference screw fixation (ISF) would mitigate this concern, this fixation method has not been investigated in clubfoot patients. This study aims to investigate the performance of ISF versus SBF for TAT transfer in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric feet were obtained. One of each matched specimen underwent TAT transfer to the lateral cuneiform using ISF and the other underwent TAT transfer using SBF. For each ISF specimen, the tension of the transferred TAT required to bring the ankle to neutral was measured. This tension was then applied to both matched specimens using an MTS machine. Tension dissipation was measured after a 20-minute interval. In specimens with SBF, a load cell was positioned between the plantar skin and suture button to determine plantar skin pressure at the time of initial tension application. Average tension necessary to achieve neutral dorsiflexion was 49.4 N. Average tension dissipation after 20 min was significantly less in the IFS group (20 N versus 23.6 N, P  = 0.02). No fixation failures occurred in either group. Average plantar foot skin pressure was 196.5 mmHg at initial tension application, exceeding thresholds for tissue ischemia. ISF allows for tendon tensioning at forces beyond those expected to result in skin necrosis with SBF with less dissipation of tension over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"503-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) transfer to the lateral cuneiform is commonly utilized to treat dynamic supination for relapsed clubfoot deformity. Traditional suture button fixation (SBF) may lead to skin necrosis at the button/skin interface. While interference screw fixation (ISF) would mitigate this concern, this fixation method has not been investigated in clubfoot patients. This study aims to investigate the performance of ISF versus SBF for TAT transfer in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric feet were obtained. One of each matched specimen underwent TAT transfer to the lateral cuneiform using ISF and the other underwent TAT transfer using SBF. For each ISF specimen, the tension of the transferred TAT required to bring the ankle to neutral was measured. This tension was then applied to both matched specimens using an MTS machine. Tension dissipation was measured after a 20-minute interval. In specimens with SBF, a load cell was positioned between the plantar skin and suture button to determine plantar skin pressure at the time of initial tension application. Average tension necessary to achieve neutral dorsiflexion was 49.4 N. Average tension dissipation after 20 min was significantly less in the IFS group (20 N versus 23.6 N, P  = 0.02). No fixation failures occurred in either group. Average plantar foot skin pressure was 196.5 mmHg at initial tension application, exceeding thresholds for tissue ischemia. ISF allows for tendon tensioning at forces beyond those expected to result in skin necrosis with SBF with less dissipation of tension over time.

干扰螺钉与缝线扣固定治疗胫骨前肌腱转移:生物力学分析。
胫骨前肌腱(TAT)转移到外侧楔形肌通常用于治疗复发性马蹄内翻足畸形的动态仰卧位。传统的缝合按钮固定(SBF)可能导致按钮/皮肤界面处的皮肤坏死。虽然干涉螺钉固定(ISF)可以减轻这种担忧,但这种固定方法尚未在马蹄内翻足患者中进行研究。本研究旨在研究尸体模型中ISF与SBF在TAT转移中的性能。获得了10对匹配的尸体脚。每个匹配样本中的一个使用ISF进行TAT转移到侧楔形文字上,另一个使用SBF进行STAT转移。对于每个ISF样本,测量将脚踝置于中性所需的转移TAT的张力。然后使用MTS机器将该张力施加到两个匹配的试样上。在间隔20分钟后测量张力耗散。在患有SBF的标本中,将测压元件放置在足底皮肤和缝合按钮之间,以确定初始施加张力时的足底皮肤压力。实现中性背屈所需的平均张力为49.4 N.20后的平均张力耗散 min明显低于IFS组(20 N与23.6 N、 P = 0.02)。两组均未发生固定失败。足底平均皮肤压力为196.5 mmHg,超过组织缺血阈值。ISF允许肌腱在超出预期的力的情况下张紧,从而导致SBF的皮肤坏死,并且随着时间的推移,张力的消散较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信