Telehealth Availability for Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.2196/45518
Victoria A Marks, Walter R Hsiang, James Nie, Waez Umer, Afash Haleem, Bayan Galal, Irene Pak, Dana Kim, Michelle C Salazar, Haddon Pantel, Elizabeth R Berger, Daniel J Boffa, Jaime A Cavallo, Michael S Leapman
{"title":"Telehealth Availability for Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Victoria A Marks, Walter R Hsiang, James Nie, Waez Umer, Afash Haleem, Bayan Galal, Irene Pak, Dana Kim, Michelle C Salazar, Haddon Pantel, Elizabeth R Berger, Daniel J Boffa, Jaime A Cavallo, Michael S Leapman","doi":"10.2196/45518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth was an important strategy for maintaining continuity of cancer care during the coronavirus pandemic and has continued to play a role in outpatient care; however, it is unknown whether services are equally available across cancer hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess telehealth availability at cancer hospitals for new and established patients with common cancers to contextualize the impact of access barriers to technology on overall access to health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national cross-sectional secret shopper study from June to November 2020 to assess telehealth availability at cancer hospitals for new and established patients with colorectal, breast, and skin (melanoma) cancer. We examined facility-level factors to determine predictors of telehealth availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 312 investigated facilities, 97.1% (n=303) provided telehealth services for at least 1 cancer site. Telehealth was less available to new compared to established patients (n=226, 72% vs n=301, 97.1%). The surveyed cancer hospitals more commonly offered telehealth visits for breast cancer care (n=266, 85%) and provided lower access to telehealth for skin (melanoma) cancer care (n=231, 74%). Most hospitals (n=163, 52%) offered telehealth for all 3 cancer types. Telehealth availability was weakly correlated across cancer types within a given facility for new (r=0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.23) and established (r=0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.21) patients. Telehealth was more commonly available for new patients at National Cancer Institute-designated facilities, medical school-affiliated facilities, and major teaching sites, with high total admissions and below-average timeliness of care. Telehealth availability for established patients was highest at Academic Comprehensive Cancer Programs, nongovernment and nonprofit facilities, medical school-affiliated facilities, Accountable Care Organizations, and facilities with a high number of total admissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite an increase in telehealth services for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified differences in access across cancer hospitals, which may relate to measures of clinical volume, affiliation, and infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/45518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth was an important strategy for maintaining continuity of cancer care during the coronavirus pandemic and has continued to play a role in outpatient care; however, it is unknown whether services are equally available across cancer hospitals.

Objective: This study aimed to assess telehealth availability at cancer hospitals for new and established patients with common cancers to contextualize the impact of access barriers to technology on overall access to health care.

Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional secret shopper study from June to November 2020 to assess telehealth availability at cancer hospitals for new and established patients with colorectal, breast, and skin (melanoma) cancer. We examined facility-level factors to determine predictors of telehealth availability.

Results: Of the 312 investigated facilities, 97.1% (n=303) provided telehealth services for at least 1 cancer site. Telehealth was less available to new compared to established patients (n=226, 72% vs n=301, 97.1%). The surveyed cancer hospitals more commonly offered telehealth visits for breast cancer care (n=266, 85%) and provided lower access to telehealth for skin (melanoma) cancer care (n=231, 74%). Most hospitals (n=163, 52%) offered telehealth for all 3 cancer types. Telehealth availability was weakly correlated across cancer types within a given facility for new (r=0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.23) and established (r=0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.21) patients. Telehealth was more commonly available for new patients at National Cancer Institute-designated facilities, medical school-affiliated facilities, and major teaching sites, with high total admissions and below-average timeliness of care. Telehealth availability for established patients was highest at Academic Comprehensive Cancer Programs, nongovernment and nonprofit facilities, medical school-affiliated facilities, Accountable Care Organizations, and facilities with a high number of total admissions.

Conclusions: Despite an increase in telehealth services for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified differences in access across cancer hospitals, which may relate to measures of clinical volume, affiliation, and infrastructure.

新冠肺炎大流行期间癌症远程医疗的可用性:跨部门研究。
背景:在冠状病毒大流行期间,远程医疗是保持癌症护理连续性的重要策略,并继续在门诊护理中发挥作用;然而,尚不清楚癌症医院是否同样提供服务。目的:本研究旨在评估癌症医院为患有常见癌症的新患者和确诊患者提供远程医疗的情况,以了解技术获取障碍对总体医疗服务的影响。方法:我们于2020年6月至11月进行了一项全国性的跨部门秘密购物者研究,以评估癌症医院为结直肠癌、乳腺癌和皮肤(黑色素瘤)癌症新患者和确诊患者提供远程医疗的可能性。我们检查了设施水平的因素,以确定远程医疗可用性的预测因素。结果:在312个调查机构中,97.1%(n=303)为至少1个癌症部位提供远程医疗服务。与确诊患者相比,新患者获得远程医疗的机会更少(n=226,72%vs n=301,97.1%)。接受调查的癌症医院更经常为癌症乳腺癌护理提供远程医疗就诊(n=266,85%),为癌症皮肤(黑色素瘤)护理提供较低的远程医疗机会(n=231,74%)。大多数医院(n=163,52%)为所有3种癌症类型提供远程医疗。对于新患者(r=0.16,95%CI 0.09-0.23)和已建立(r=0.14,95%CI0.08-0.21)的患者,在给定设施内癌症类型之间的远程医疗可用性弱相关。在国家癌症研究所指定的机构、医学院附属机构和主要教学点,新患者更容易获得远程医疗,总入院人数高,护理及时性低于平均水平。在学术综合癌症项目、非政府和非营利机构、医学院附属机构、责任护理组织和总入院人数较多的机构,确诊患者的远程医疗可用性最高。结论:尽管在新冠肺炎大流行期间,为癌症患者提供的远程医疗服务有所增加,但我们发现了癌症医院在获得服务方面的差异,这可能与临床数量、隶属关系和基础设施的测量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信