Incorporación de resultados informados por pacientes con psoriasis y dermatitis atópica en las consultas de atención farmacéutica y dermatología: herramienta que mejora la calidad asistencial y resultados en salud

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M.Á. González-Fernández , P. Herranz-Pinto , M.L. Alonso-Pacheco , C. Mateo-Salillas , Á. Hoyo-Muñoz , I. Jiménez-Nácher , F. Moreno-Ramos , A. Herrero-Ambrosio
{"title":"Incorporación de resultados informados por pacientes con psoriasis y dermatitis atópica en las consultas de atención farmacéutica y dermatología: herramienta que mejora la calidad asistencial y resultados en salud","authors":"M.Á. González-Fernández ,&nbsp;P. Herranz-Pinto ,&nbsp;M.L. Alonso-Pacheco ,&nbsp;C. Mateo-Salillas ,&nbsp;Á. Hoyo-Muñoz ,&nbsp;I. Jiménez-Nácher ,&nbsp;F. Moreno-Ramos ,&nbsp;A. Herrero-Ambrosio","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information about their disease, treatment, and quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To introduce a new system of work coordinated between pharmacists and dermatologists, based on the collection and analysis of PROs to assess its clinical impact as well as patients satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted under clinical conditions and included adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis (PS) and atopic dermatitis (AD) between April-2021 and February-2022.</p><p>Pharmacists and dermatologists agreed on this systematic work. A REDCap® database was designed to facilitate data collection and the subsequent analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 288 and 41 patients with PS and AD, respectively, were included. Those who started treatment showed significant improvement with a decrease in PROs and clinical parameters (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The pharmacist made 168 and 7 recommendations to dermatologists for PS and AD patients, respectively, of which 66.07% and 57.1% were accepted. The most common recommendations were «consult with rheumatologist» (20.83%), «extend drug regimen» (19.64%) and «consider change in treatment» (11.90%). Adverse events were reported in 55 and 17 patients with PS and AD, respectively. Of 103 patients, 75% were «very satisfied» and 20% «satisfied» with the system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This new working system helps to evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of treatments and also to identify adverse events, alarm symptoms and co-morbidities in order to optimize therapies. Collaboration between pharmacists and dermatologists reduces decision-making time and patients appreciate better clinical care leading to higher patient satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information about their disease, treatment, and quality of life.

Objective

To introduce a new system of work coordinated between pharmacists and dermatologists, based on the collection and analysis of PROs to assess its clinical impact as well as patients satisfaction.

Method

A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted under clinical conditions and included adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis (PS) and atopic dermatitis (AD) between April-2021 and February-2022.

Pharmacists and dermatologists agreed on this systematic work. A REDCap® database was designed to facilitate data collection and the subsequent analysis.

Results

A total of 288 and 41 patients with PS and AD, respectively, were included. Those who started treatment showed significant improvement with a decrease in PROs and clinical parameters (p < 0.001). The pharmacist made 168 and 7 recommendations to dermatologists for PS and AD patients, respectively, of which 66.07% and 57.1% were accepted. The most common recommendations were «consult with rheumatologist» (20.83%), «extend drug regimen» (19.64%) and «consider change in treatment» (11.90%). Adverse events were reported in 55 and 17 patients with PS and AD, respectively. Of 103 patients, 75% were «very satisfied» and 20% «satisfied» with the system.

Conclusions

This new working system helps to evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of treatments and also to identify adverse events, alarm symptoms and co-morbidities in order to optimize therapies. Collaboration between pharmacists and dermatologists reduces decision-making time and patients appreciate better clinical care leading to higher patient satisfaction.

[将银屑病和特应性皮炎患者报告的结果纳入药房和皮肤科,作为提高医疗质量和健康结果的工具]。
引言:患者报告的结果(PROs)提供了有关其疾病、治疗和生活质量的主观信息。目的:在收集和分析PROs的基础上,引入一种新的药剂师和皮肤科医生协调的工作系统,以评估其临床影响和患者满意度。方法:在临床条件下进行一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究,纳入2021年4月至2022年2月期间诊断为银屑病(PS)和特应性皮炎(AD)的成年患者。药剂师和皮肤科医生同意这项系统性的工作。REDCap®数据库旨在促进数据收集和后续分析。结果:共纳入288例PS和41例AD患者。那些开始治疗的患者表现出显著的改善,PROs和临床参数降低(p<0.001)。药剂师分别向皮肤科医生提出了168和7项针对PS和AD患者的建议,其中66.07%和57.1%被接受。最常见的建议是“咨询风湿病学家”(20.83%)、“延长用药方案”(19.64%)和“考虑改变治疗”(11.90%)。分别有55名和17名PS和AD患者报告了不良事件。在103名患者中,75%的患者对该系统“非常满意”,20%的患者对系统“满意”。结论:这一新的工作系统有助于评估治疗的短期和长期有效性,并识别不良事件、警报症状和合并症,以优化治疗。药剂师和皮肤科医生之间的合作减少了决策时间,患者可以享受更好的临床护理,从而提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信