What an International Declaration on Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Could Look like: Ideas, Suggestions, Desiderata.

Q1 Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512
Jan Christoph Bublitz
{"title":"What an International Declaration on Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Could Look like: Ideas, Suggestions, Desiderata.","authors":"Jan Christoph Bublitz","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>International institutions such as UNESCO are deliberating on a new standard setting instrument for neurotechnologies. This will likely lead to the adoption of a soft law document which will be the first global document specifically tailored to neurotechnologies, setting the tone for further international or domestic regulations. While some stakeholders have been consulted, these developments have so far evaded the broader attention of the neuroscience, neurotech, and neuroethics communities. To initiate a broader debate, this target article puts to discussion twenty-five considerations and desiderata for recognition by a future instrument. They are formulated at different levels of abstraction, from the big picture to technical details, seek to widen the perspective of preparatory reports and transcend the narrow debate about \"neurorights\" which overshadows many richer and more relevant aspects. These desiderata are not an exhaustive enumeration but a starting point for discussions about what deserves and what requires protection by an international instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"96-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International institutions such as UNESCO are deliberating on a new standard setting instrument for neurotechnologies. This will likely lead to the adoption of a soft law document which will be the first global document specifically tailored to neurotechnologies, setting the tone for further international or domestic regulations. While some stakeholders have been consulted, these developments have so far evaded the broader attention of the neuroscience, neurotech, and neuroethics communities. To initiate a broader debate, this target article puts to discussion twenty-five considerations and desiderata for recognition by a future instrument. They are formulated at different levels of abstraction, from the big picture to technical details, seek to widen the perspective of preparatory reports and transcend the narrow debate about "neurorights" which overshadows many richer and more relevant aspects. These desiderata are not an exhaustive enumeration but a starting point for discussions about what deserves and what requires protection by an international instrument.

一份关于神经技术与人权的国际宣言会是什么样子:想法、建议、渴望。
联合国教科文组织等国际机构正在审议一项新的神经技术标准制定工具。这可能会导致通过一份软性法律文件,这将是第一份专门针对神经技术的全球文件,为进一步的国际或国内法规奠定基调。虽然已经咨询了一些利益相关者,但到目前为止,这些发展还没有引起神经科学、神经技术和神经伦理学界的广泛关注。为了引发更广泛的辩论,这篇目标文章讨论了25个考虑因素和未来文书承认的愿望。它们是在不同的抽象层次上制定的,从大局到技术细节,试图拓宽筹备报告的视角,超越关于“神经权利”的狭隘辩论,这掩盖了许多更丰富、更相关的方面。这些渴望并不是详尽的列举,而是讨论国际文书应该保护什么和需要保护什么的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信