The Role of Mechanistic Biomarkers in Understanding Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Humans.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mitchell R McGill
{"title":"The Role of Mechanistic Biomarkers in Understanding Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Humans.","authors":"Mitchell R McGill","doi":"10.1124/dmd.123.001281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our understanding of the fundamental molecular mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity began in 1973 to 1974, when investigators at the US National Institutes of Health published seminal studies demonstrating conversion of APAP to a reactive metabolite that depletes glutathione and binds to proteins in the liver in mice after overdose. Since then, additional groundbreaking experiments have demonstrated critical roles for mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, nuclear DNA fragmentation, and necrotic cell death as well. Over the years, some investigators have also attempted to translate these mechanisms to humans using human specimens from APAP overdose patients. This review presents those studies and summarizes what we have learned about APAP hepatotoxicity in humans so far. Overall, the mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity in humans strongly resemble those discovered in experimental mouse and cultured hepatocyte models, and emerging biomarkers also suggest similarities in liver repair. The data not only validate the first mechanistic studies of APAP-induced liver injury performed 50 years ago but also demonstrate the human relevance of numerous studies conducted since then. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Human studies using novel translational, mechanistic biomarkers have confirmed that the fundamental mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity discovered in rodent models since 1973 are the same in humans. Importantly, these findings have guided the development and understanding of treatments such as <i>N</i>-acetyl-<i>l</i>-cysteine and 4-methylpyrazole over the years. Additional research may improve not only our understanding of APAP overdose pathophysiology in humans but also our ability to predict and treat serious liver injury in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11309,"journal":{"name":"Drug Metabolism and Disposition","volume":" ","pages":"729-739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Metabolism and Disposition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.123.001281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our understanding of the fundamental molecular mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity began in 1973 to 1974, when investigators at the US National Institutes of Health published seminal studies demonstrating conversion of APAP to a reactive metabolite that depletes glutathione and binds to proteins in the liver in mice after overdose. Since then, additional groundbreaking experiments have demonstrated critical roles for mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, nuclear DNA fragmentation, and necrotic cell death as well. Over the years, some investigators have also attempted to translate these mechanisms to humans using human specimens from APAP overdose patients. This review presents those studies and summarizes what we have learned about APAP hepatotoxicity in humans so far. Overall, the mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity in humans strongly resemble those discovered in experimental mouse and cultured hepatocyte models, and emerging biomarkers also suggest similarities in liver repair. The data not only validate the first mechanistic studies of APAP-induced liver injury performed 50 years ago but also demonstrate the human relevance of numerous studies conducted since then. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Human studies using novel translational, mechanistic biomarkers have confirmed that the fundamental mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity discovered in rodent models since 1973 are the same in humans. Importantly, these findings have guided the development and understanding of treatments such as N-acetyl-l-cysteine and 4-methylpyrazole over the years. Additional research may improve not only our understanding of APAP overdose pathophysiology in humans but also our ability to predict and treat serious liver injury in patients.

机制生物标志物在理解对乙酰氨基酚对人类肝毒性中的作用。
我们对APAP肝毒性的基本分子机制的理解始于1973年至1974年,当时美国国立卫生研究院的研究人员发表了开创性研究,证明APAP在过量服用后转化为一种活性代谢产物,消耗谷胱甘肽并与小鼠肝脏中的蛋白质结合。从那时起,其他突破性的实验也证明了线粒体损伤、氧化应激、核DNA断裂和坏死细胞死亡的关键作用。多年来,一些研究人员还试图使用APAP过量患者的人体标本将这些机制转化为人类。这篇综述介绍了这些研究,并总结了迄今为止我们对APAP对人类肝毒性的了解。总的来说,人类APAP肝毒性的机制与实验小鼠和培养的肝细胞模型中发现的机制非常相似,而新出现的生物标志物也表明了肝脏修复的相似性。这些数据不仅验证了50年前首次对APAP诱导的肝损伤进行的机制研究,而且证明了此后进行的大量研究与人类的相关性。意义声明使用新型转化机制生物标志物的人类研究证实,自1973年以来在啮齿动物模型中发现的APAP肝毒性的基本机制在人类中是相同的。重要的是,这些发现多年来指导了N-乙酰基-1-半胱氨酸和4-甲基吡唑等治疗方法的发展和理解。进一步的研究不仅可以提高我们对人类APAP过量病理生理学的理解,还可以提高我们预测和治疗患者严重肝损伤的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An important reference for all pharmacology and toxicology departments, DMD is also a valuable resource for medicinal chemists involved in drug design and biochemists with an interest in drug metabolism, expression of drug metabolizing enzymes, and regulation of drug metabolizing enzyme gene expression. Articles provide experimental results from in vitro and in vivo systems that bring you significant and original information on metabolism and disposition of endogenous and exogenous compounds, including pharmacologic agents and environmental chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信