Evaluation of commercial assays for the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in hemodialysis patients

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ashley Di Meo , Liyan Ma , Kevin Yau , Kento T. Abe , Karen Colwill , Anne-Claude Gingras , Robert Kozak , Michelle A. Hladunewich , Paul M. Yip
{"title":"Evaluation of commercial assays for the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in hemodialysis patients","authors":"Ashley Di Meo ,&nbsp;Liyan Ma ,&nbsp;Kevin Yau ,&nbsp;Kento T. Abe ,&nbsp;Karen Colwill ,&nbsp;Anne-Claude Gingras ,&nbsp;Robert Kozak ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Hladunewich ,&nbsp;Paul M. Yip","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hemodialysis patients exhibit variable immunogenicity following administration of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the use of two commercial assays in the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in hemodialysis patients and to compare their utility to commonly used SARS-CoV-2 serological assays developed in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated serologic antibody response in 85 hemodialysis patients up to 6 months after receiving both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. In addition, antibody response was assessed in 46 chronic kidney disease patients and 40 COVID-19 naïve health care workers (HCW) up to 3 months and 9 months, respectively. Anti-spike (S) and anti-nucleocapsid (N) levels were measured using Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays on the Roche analyzer and compared to ELISA-based detection of anti-S, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD), and anti-N.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Elecsys anti-N immunoassay showed 93 % concordance with the anti-N ELISA. The Elecsys anti-S immunoassay showed 97 % concordance with the anti-S ELISA and 89 % concordance with the anti-RBD ELISA. HCWs exhibited significantly higher anti-S levels relative to hemodialysis patients. Anti-S levels decreased significantly over a 6-month period (p &lt; 0.001) in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. In addition, anti-S levels decreased significantly over a 9-month (p &lt; 0.001) and 3-month period (p &lt; 0.001) in HCWs and CKD patients, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is high concordance between commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological assays and SARS-CoV-2 serological assays developed in Canada. Hemodialysis patients exhibited varying immunogenicity following two doses of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with anti-S levels decreasing over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912023002096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hemodialysis patients exhibit variable immunogenicity following administration of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the use of two commercial assays in the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in hemodialysis patients and to compare their utility to commonly used SARS-CoV-2 serological assays developed in Canada.

Methods

We evaluated serologic antibody response in 85 hemodialysis patients up to 6 months after receiving both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. In addition, antibody response was assessed in 46 chronic kidney disease patients and 40 COVID-19 naïve health care workers (HCW) up to 3 months and 9 months, respectively. Anti-spike (S) and anti-nucleocapsid (N) levels were measured using Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays on the Roche analyzer and compared to ELISA-based detection of anti-S, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD), and anti-N.

Results

The Elecsys anti-N immunoassay showed 93 % concordance with the anti-N ELISA. The Elecsys anti-S immunoassay showed 97 % concordance with the anti-S ELISA and 89 % concordance with the anti-RBD ELISA. HCWs exhibited significantly higher anti-S levels relative to hemodialysis patients. Anti-S levels decreased significantly over a 6-month period (p < 0.001) in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. In addition, anti-S levels decreased significantly over a 9-month (p < 0.001) and 3-month period (p < 0.001) in HCWs and CKD patients, respectively.

Conclusions

There is high concordance between commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological assays and SARS-CoV-2 serological assays developed in Canada. Hemodialysis patients exhibited varying immunogenicity following two doses of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with anti-S levels decreasing over time.

评估血液透析患者严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗体反应的商业分析。
背景:血液透析患者在接种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型信使核糖核酸疫苗后表现出可变的免疫原性。本研究的目的是评估两种商业检测方法在评估血液透析患者严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗体反应中的应用,并将其与加拿大开发的常用严重急性呼吸系冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法进行比较 接种两剂Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2新冠肺炎mRNA疫苗数月后。此外,对46名慢性肾脏病患者和40名新冠肺炎天真的医护人员(HCW)进行了抗体反应评估,其中3人 月和9 月。在罗氏分析仪上使用Elecsys抗严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型免疫测定法测量抗刺突(S)和抗核衣壳(N)水平,并与基于ELISA的抗S、抗受体结合域(RBD)和抗N检测进行比较 % 与抗N ELISA一致。Elecsys抗S免疫测定显示97 % 与抗S ELISA和89的一致性 % 与抗RBD ELISA一致。与血液透析患者相比,HCW表现出明显更高的抗S水平。抗-S水平在6个月内显著下降(p 结论:商业化的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型血清学检测与加拿大开发的严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒二型血清学检测之间存在高度一致性。血液透析患者在接种两剂新冠肺炎mRNA疫苗后表现出不同的免疫原性,抗S水平随时间降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信