Are agroforestry systems more productive than monocultures in Mediterranean countries? A meta-analysis

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Danilo Scordia, Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia, Jaime Coello, Rosa Vilaplana Ventura, Diana Elisa Jiménez-De-Santiago, Berta Singla Just, Omar Castaño-Sánchez, Carme Casas Arcarons, Marc Tchamitchian, Léa Garreau, Mohamed Emran, Sami Z. Mohamed, Mai Khedr, Mohamed Rashad, Roxanne Suzette Lorilla, Alexandre Parizel, Giuseppe Mancini, Antonella Iurato, Sergio Ponsá, Corrado Dimauro, Fabio Gresta, Salvatore Luciano Cosentino, Giorgio Testa
{"title":"Are agroforestry systems more productive than monocultures in Mediterranean countries? A meta-analysis","authors":"Danilo Scordia,&nbsp;Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia,&nbsp;Jaime Coello,&nbsp;Rosa Vilaplana Ventura,&nbsp;Diana Elisa Jiménez-De-Santiago,&nbsp;Berta Singla Just,&nbsp;Omar Castaño-Sánchez,&nbsp;Carme Casas Arcarons,&nbsp;Marc Tchamitchian,&nbsp;Léa Garreau,&nbsp;Mohamed Emran,&nbsp;Sami Z. Mohamed,&nbsp;Mai Khedr,&nbsp;Mohamed Rashad,&nbsp;Roxanne Suzette Lorilla,&nbsp;Alexandre Parizel,&nbsp;Giuseppe Mancini,&nbsp;Antonella Iurato,&nbsp;Sergio Ponsá,&nbsp;Corrado Dimauro,&nbsp;Fabio Gresta,&nbsp;Salvatore Luciano Cosentino,&nbsp;Giorgio Testa","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry is gaining interest due to its potential in enhancing climate resilience and sustainability of farming systems. In this meta-analysis, the crop yield in agroforestry system compared to the control (sole crop) from thirty-six experimental field trials in Mediterranean countries was assessed. The response variable Wlog(RR) (i.e., the weighted natural logarithm of the response ratio) was analyzed by the 95% confidence intervals of mean and by fitting eight linear mixed models. Fixed effects, namely the tree cover (low, medium, high), the tree species (ash tree, chestnut, cork oak, holm oak, olive, poplar, walnut), and the crop species (alfalfa, barley, durum wheat, faba bean, forage, oat, pasture, pea, winter wheat) were significant (<i>P</i> = 0.030, <i>P</i> = 0.017, and <i>P</i> = 0.014, respectively), while the system type (alley cropping, silvo-arable, silvo-pastoral) was not. Among management practices (variety, pruning, fertilization, irrigation, crop age classes, imposed warming and drought, harvest time), only the fertilization significantly improved the response variable (<i>P</i> = 0.006), while the interaction of pruning × crop species was marginally significant (<i>P</i> = 0.065). Relatively large study heterogeneity was observed (<i>Q</i> = 72.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 72%), which is quite common for agronomic meta-analysis. On the contrary, publication bias based on funnel plots and the Trim and Fill method suggested symmetrical distribution of studies. The sensitivity analysis for significant models identified room for improvements. Overall, we observed a negative effect of trees on crop yield that could be ascribed to the competition for light. Nonetheless, facilitation could be expected under extreme climate events, provided that agricultural practices will maximize synergies among tree cover, tree species, crop species, and management. Future works are encouraged to focus on the overall benefit agroforestry can provide at the field and landscape level, along with long-term monitoring to assess the whole lifespan of these systems and other companion planting options and designs in the Mediterranean region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry is gaining interest due to its potential in enhancing climate resilience and sustainability of farming systems. In this meta-analysis, the crop yield in agroforestry system compared to the control (sole crop) from thirty-six experimental field trials in Mediterranean countries was assessed. The response variable Wlog(RR) (i.e., the weighted natural logarithm of the response ratio) was analyzed by the 95% confidence intervals of mean and by fitting eight linear mixed models. Fixed effects, namely the tree cover (low, medium, high), the tree species (ash tree, chestnut, cork oak, holm oak, olive, poplar, walnut), and the crop species (alfalfa, barley, durum wheat, faba bean, forage, oat, pasture, pea, winter wheat) were significant (P = 0.030, P = 0.017, and P = 0.014, respectively), while the system type (alley cropping, silvo-arable, silvo-pastoral) was not. Among management practices (variety, pruning, fertilization, irrigation, crop age classes, imposed warming and drought, harvest time), only the fertilization significantly improved the response variable (P = 0.006), while the interaction of pruning × crop species was marginally significant (P = 0.065). Relatively large study heterogeneity was observed (Q = 72.6, I2 = 72%), which is quite common for agronomic meta-analysis. On the contrary, publication bias based on funnel plots and the Trim and Fill method suggested symmetrical distribution of studies. The sensitivity analysis for significant models identified room for improvements. Overall, we observed a negative effect of trees on crop yield that could be ascribed to the competition for light. Nonetheless, facilitation could be expected under extreme climate events, provided that agricultural practices will maximize synergies among tree cover, tree species, crop species, and management. Future works are encouraged to focus on the overall benefit agroforestry can provide at the field and landscape level, along with long-term monitoring to assess the whole lifespan of these systems and other companion planting options and designs in the Mediterranean region.

在地中海国家,农林复合系统是否比单一栽培更有生产力?一个荟萃分析
农林业因其在增强农业系统的气候适应能力和可持续性方面的潜力而日益受到关注。在本荟萃分析中,对地中海国家36个试验田试验的农林复合系统作物产量与对照(单一作物)进行了评估。响应变量Wlog(RR)(即响应比的加权自然对数)通过均值的95%置信区间和8个线性混合模型进行分析。固定效应,即树木覆盖度(低、中、高)、树种(白蜡树、栗子、栓皮栎、黑栎、橄榄、杨树、核桃)和作物种类(苜蓿、大麦、硬粒小麦、蚕豆、牧草、燕麦、牧草、豌豆、冬小麦)显著(P = 0.030、P = 0.017和P = 0.014),而系统类型(旱作、银耕、银牧)不显著。在管理措施(品种、修剪、施肥、灌溉、作物年龄等级、增温增旱、收获时间)中,只有施肥显著提高了响应变量(P = 0.006),而修剪与作物种类的交互作用极显著(P = 0.065)。观察到较大的研究异质性(Q = 72.6, I2 = 72%),这在农艺荟萃分析中很常见。相反,基于漏斗图和Trim and Fill方法的发表偏倚表明研究分布对称。对重要模型的敏感性分析确定了改进的余地。总的来说,我们观察到树木对作物产量的负面影响,这可能归因于对光线的竞争。尽管如此,在极端气候事件下,只要农业实践能够最大限度地发挥树木覆盖、树种、作物物种和管理之间的协同作用,就可以实现促进。鼓励未来的工作将重点放在农林业在田间和景观层面可以提供的整体效益上,同时进行长期监测,以评估这些系统的整个生命周期以及地中海地区其他配套种植选择和设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信