Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/15266028231208657
Jose Torrealba, Alessandro Grandi, Petroula Nana, Giuseppe Panuccio, Fiona Rohlffs, Tilo Kölbel
{"title":"Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts.","authors":"Jose Torrealba, Alessandro Grandi, Petroula Nana, Giuseppe Panuccio, Fiona Rohlffs, Tilo Kölbel","doi":"10.1177/15266028231208657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An \"up-and-over\" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice.Clinical ImpactIn this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1457-1465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231208657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery.

Methods: Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated.

Results: From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An "up-and-over" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years.

Conclusions: The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice.Clinical ImpactIn this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.

既往主动脉移植术后植入髂支装置的经股通路。
目的:报告患者在先前的开放或血管内主动脉-胆道修复术后,仅使用股骨通道进行导管插入术并将覆盖支架输送至腹下动脉,进行髂支装置植入的结果。方法:单中心回顾性研究,对所有在既往开放或血管内修复后植入髂支装置的患者进行了鉴定。纳入了通过股动脉专用通道进行腹下动脉插管和桥接覆盖支架递送的患者。根据外科医生的喜好使用不同的技术。评估了技术成功和通路相关并发症,以及随访期间髂支装置内漏或闭塞。结果:从2015年到2021年,28名既往经开放或血管内主动脉-胆道修复的患者接受了34次髂支装置植入。大多数患者(71%)患有蛛网膜下腔或胸腹主动脉瘤,82%患有髂总动脉瘤,25%患有腹下动脉瘤。21%的患者进行了双侧髂支装置植入,26%的患者获得了臀上动脉的植入。65%的病例使用对侧腹股沟的“上下”技术,35%的病例使用可操纵鞘。技术成功率为94%,无与进入或在腹下动脉导管和输送支架技术相关的并发症。该队列有20%的主要并发症,3例围手术期死亡。Kaplan-Meier估计髂支装置在2年时无闭塞和内漏的情况分别为92%和83%。结论:在以前的主动脉或涉及主动脉分叉的开放性内移植物上植入髂支装置是可行和安全的。我们建议使用股骨入路作为首选入路。临床影响:在这项研究中,我们介绍了28例既往有主髂动脉移植物的患者,其中髂支装置作为后续步骤。我们证明了该技术的可行性,尽管很难以陡峭的角度穿过新分叉,而且没有与该技术相关的并发症。根据我们的经验,我们建议将经股动脉入路作为绕过腹下动脉支架的第一选择,保留上肢入路及其可能的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信