Isometric thumb extension exercise as part of a multimodal intervention for de Quervain's syndrome: A randomised feasibility trial.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1177/17589983231158499
Brodwen McBain, Ebonie Rio, Jill Cook, Jeffrey Sanderson, Sean Docking
{"title":"Isometric thumb extension exercise as part of a multimodal intervention for de Quervain's syndrome: A randomised feasibility trial.","authors":"Brodwen McBain,&nbsp;Ebonie Rio,&nbsp;Jill Cook,&nbsp;Jeffrey Sanderson,&nbsp;Sean Docking","doi":"10.1177/17589983231158499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>de Quervain's syndrome is a painful condition commonly presented to hand therapists. Exercise is utilised as an intervention, but isometric exercise has not been investigated. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of isometric thumb extension exercise for de Quervain's syndrome and to explore differences between high-load and low-load isometric exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This parallel-group randomised clinical feasibility trial included individuals with de Quervain's syndrome. All participants underwent a 2 week washout period where they received an orthosis, education, and range of motion exercises. Eligible participants were then randomised to receive high or low-load isometric thumb extension exercises, performed daily for 4 weeks. Feasibility and safety were assessed by recruitment and drop-out rates, adherence, adverse events, and participant feedback via semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes for pain and function, and blinded assessment of range of motion and strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight participants were randomised. There were no drop-outs after randomisation, and no serious adverse events. Adherence to exercise was 86.7%, with 84% of participants stating they would choose to participate again. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and function over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in range of motion or strength. There were no statistically significant between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isometric thumb extension exercise within a multimodal approach appears a safe and feasible intervention for people with de Quervain's syndrome. A large multi-centre trial would be required to compare high- and low-load isometric exercises. Further research investigating exercise and multimodal interventions in this population is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"28 2","pages":"72-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983231158499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: de Quervain's syndrome is a painful condition commonly presented to hand therapists. Exercise is utilised as an intervention, but isometric exercise has not been investigated. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of isometric thumb extension exercise for de Quervain's syndrome and to explore differences between high-load and low-load isometric exercise.

Methods: This parallel-group randomised clinical feasibility trial included individuals with de Quervain's syndrome. All participants underwent a 2 week washout period where they received an orthosis, education, and range of motion exercises. Eligible participants were then randomised to receive high or low-load isometric thumb extension exercises, performed daily for 4 weeks. Feasibility and safety were assessed by recruitment and drop-out rates, adherence, adverse events, and participant feedback via semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes for pain and function, and blinded assessment of range of motion and strength.

Results: Twenty-eight participants were randomised. There were no drop-outs after randomisation, and no serious adverse events. Adherence to exercise was 86.7%, with 84% of participants stating they would choose to participate again. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and function over time (p < 0.001) but not in range of motion or strength. There were no statistically significant between-group differences.

Conclusions: Isometric thumb extension exercise within a multimodal approach appears a safe and feasible intervention for people with de Quervain's syndrome. A large multi-centre trial would be required to compare high- and low-load isometric exercises. Further research investigating exercise and multimodal interventions in this population is warranted.

等长拇指伸展运动作为de Quervain综合征多模式干预的一部分:一项随机可行性试验。
引言:德·奎尔万综合征是一种常见于手部治疗师的疼痛症状。运动被用作一种干预措施,但等长运动尚未被研究。我们旨在评估等长拇指伸展运动治疗de Quervain综合征的可行性和安全性,并探讨高负荷和低负荷等长运动之间的差异。方法:这项平行组随机临床可行性试验包括德-奎尔万综合征患者。所有参与者都接受了为期2周的洗出期,接受了矫形器、教育和各种运动锻炼。然后,符合条件的参与者被随机分配接受高负荷或低负荷等长拇指伸展运动,每天进行4周。可行性和安全性通过招募率和辍学率、依从性、不良事件和参与者通过半结构化访谈的反馈进行评估。次要结果包括患者报告的疼痛和功能结果,以及对运动范围和力量的盲法评估。结果:28名参与者被随机分组。随机分组后无退出,无严重不良事件。坚持锻炼的比例为86.7%,84%的参与者表示他们会选择再次参加。随着时间的推移,疼痛和功能在临床和统计学上有显著改善(p<0.001),但在运动范围或力量方面没有改善。组间差异无统计学意义。结论:多模式方法下的等长拇指伸展运动对de Quervain综合征患者来说是一种安全可行的干预措施。需要进行大型多中心试验来比较高负荷和低负荷等长运动。有必要对这一人群的运动和多模式干预措施进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信