Compression gloves for patients with hand arthritis (C-GLOVES): A feasibility study.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-12 DOI:10.1177/1758998320986829
Alison Hammond, Yeliz Prior
{"title":"Compression gloves for patients with hand arthritis (C-GLOVES): A feasibility study.","authors":"Alison Hammond,&nbsp;Yeliz Prior","doi":"10.1177/1758998320986829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Compression gloves are frequently provided to patients with hand arthritis. Evidence for effectiveness is limited. The aim of this study was to determine feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, in preparation for a future compression glove trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomised feasibility study with out-patients with either undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or hand osteoarthritis, with moderate to severe hand pain. All received Isotoner™ compression gloves provided by rheumatology occupational therapists. The main outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, trial outcome selection and sample size calculation. Participants were assessed at baseline and four weeks. Assessments included: numeric rating scales (0-10) of hand pain (on activity, at rest, at night) and stiffness; hand joint swelling; finger flexion; and hand function (Grip Ability Test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 318 patients screened, 86/204 (42%) of inflammatory and 68/114 (60%) of hand osteoarthritis patients were eligible. Of these, 41 (48%: age: 59.10 (SD 12.54) years) and 32 (47%: age: 60.75 (SD 8.64) years) respectively, consented. All completed four-week follow-up. Assessment and treatment protocols were feasible. Hand pain on activity and at night, stiffness, joint swelling, finger flexion and hand function improved: e.g. hand pain on activity: inflammatory arthritis change = -0.95 (SD 2.26; p = 0.01); osteoarthritis -1.57 (SD 1.78; p = 0.001). Participants reported improved hand pain, stiffness and hand function as main benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Procedures tested were feasible. The most relevant primary outcome was hand pain on activity. Future trials would need 161 participants (Inflammatory arthritis) and 151 (hand osteoarthritis).<b>Trial registration:</b> Clinical Trials.Gov: NCT01874067.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"26 1","pages":"26-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1758998320986829","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998320986829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Compression gloves are frequently provided to patients with hand arthritis. Evidence for effectiveness is limited. The aim of this study was to determine feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, in preparation for a future compression glove trial.

Methods: A non-randomised feasibility study with out-patients with either undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or hand osteoarthritis, with moderate to severe hand pain. All received Isotoner™ compression gloves provided by rheumatology occupational therapists. The main outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, trial outcome selection and sample size calculation. Participants were assessed at baseline and four weeks. Assessments included: numeric rating scales (0-10) of hand pain (on activity, at rest, at night) and stiffness; hand joint swelling; finger flexion; and hand function (Grip Ability Test).

Results: Of 318 patients screened, 86/204 (42%) of inflammatory and 68/114 (60%) of hand osteoarthritis patients were eligible. Of these, 41 (48%: age: 59.10 (SD 12.54) years) and 32 (47%: age: 60.75 (SD 8.64) years) respectively, consented. All completed four-week follow-up. Assessment and treatment protocols were feasible. Hand pain on activity and at night, stiffness, joint swelling, finger flexion and hand function improved: e.g. hand pain on activity: inflammatory arthritis change = -0.95 (SD 2.26; p = 0.01); osteoarthritis -1.57 (SD 1.78; p = 0.001). Participants reported improved hand pain, stiffness and hand function as main benefits.

Conclusion: Procedures tested were feasible. The most relevant primary outcome was hand pain on activity. Future trials would need 161 participants (Inflammatory arthritis) and 151 (hand osteoarthritis).Trial registration: Clinical Trials.Gov: NCT01874067.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于手关节炎患者的压缩手套(C-gloves):一项可行性研究。
简介:经常为手关节炎患者提供压缩手套。有效性的证据有限。本研究的目的是确定招募、评估和治疗程序的可行性,为未来的压缩手套试验做准备。方法:一项非随机可行性研究,对象为未分化的炎症性关节炎、类风湿性关节炎或手部骨关节炎,伴有中度至重度手部疼痛的患者。所有收到的同位素™ 风湿病职业治疗师提供的压缩手套。主要结果是招募的可行性、评估和治疗程序、试验结果选择和样本量计算。在基线和四周对参与者进行评估。评估包括:手部疼痛(活动时、休息时、夜间)和僵硬的数字评定量表(0-10);手关节肿胀;手指屈曲;结果:在318名筛查患者中,86/204(42%)的炎症患者和68/114(60%)的手部骨关节炎患者符合条件。其中,分别有41人(48%:年龄:59.10(标准差12.54)岁)和32人(47%:年龄:60.75(标准差8.64)年)表示同意。所有患者均完成了为期四周的随访。评估和治疗方案是可行的。活动时和夜间手部疼痛、僵硬、关节肿胀、手指弯曲和手部功能改善:例如活动时手部疼痛:炎症性关节炎改变 = -0.95(标准差2.26;p = 0.01);骨关节炎-1.57(SD 1.78;p = 0.001)。参与者报告说,改善手部疼痛、僵硬和手部功能是主要好处。结论:所测试的程序是可行的。最相关的主要结果是活动时的手部疼痛。未来的试验需要161名参与者(炎症性关节炎)和151名参与者(手部骨关节炎)。试验注册:临床试验。政府:NCT01874067。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信