Treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese adult patients with domperidone: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xiu Cai Fang, Zhi Hui Lin, Yong Dong Wu, De An Tian, Shi Liu, Dong Sheng Wu, Han Lin, Fan Dong Meng, Mei Liu, Fan Du, Hui Jun Shu, Zhi Feng Wang, Jian Min Zhuo, Ping Wang, Meng Yu Li, Jian Xu
{"title":"Treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese adult patients with domperidone: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study","authors":"Xiu Cai Fang,&nbsp;Zhi Hui Lin,&nbsp;Yong Dong Wu,&nbsp;De An Tian,&nbsp;Shi Liu,&nbsp;Dong Sheng Wu,&nbsp;Han Lin,&nbsp;Fan Dong Meng,&nbsp;Mei Liu,&nbsp;Fan Du,&nbsp;Hui Jun Shu,&nbsp;Zhi Feng Wang,&nbsp;Jian Min Zhuo,&nbsp;Ping Wang,&nbsp;Meng Yu Li,&nbsp;Jian Xu","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.13237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of domperidone for the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and to identify the FD subtypes that potentially responded better to domperidone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter prospective study was conducted in China from August 2018 to July 2020, consisting of a 1-week screening phase and a 2-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants were randomized to receive domperidone 10 mg or matching placebo tablets thrice daily for 14 days. The primary end-point was the overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2-week therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Altogether 160 patients were included, with 80 patients in each group. The OTE response rate after 2-week therapy was significantly higher for domperidone compared with placebo (60.7% vs 46.0%; relative risk [RR] 1.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.972–1.787). Moreover, the OTE response rate after 2-week domperidone or placebo treatment was 60.3% versus 54.9% for postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) (RR 1.098, 95% CI 0.750–1.607) and 60.6% versus 35.2% for overlapping PDS–epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) (RR 1.722, 95% CI 0.995–2.980). Adverse events were reported by seven patients in the domperidone group and 12 patients in the placebo group. None of the adverse events in the domperidone group were serious.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Domperidone showed a positive pattern regarding OTE response rates after 2-week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD, as well as in subtypes of PDS and overlapping PDS–EPS. No new safety issue was observed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"24 11","pages":"603-610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of domperidone for the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and to identify the FD subtypes that potentially responded better to domperidone.

Methods

This multicenter prospective study was conducted in China from August 2018 to July 2020, consisting of a 1-week screening phase and a 2-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants were randomized to receive domperidone 10 mg or matching placebo tablets thrice daily for 14 days. The primary end-point was the overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2-week therapy.

Results

Altogether 160 patients were included, with 80 patients in each group. The OTE response rate after 2-week therapy was significantly higher for domperidone compared with placebo (60.7% vs 46.0%; relative risk [RR] 1.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.972–1.787). Moreover, the OTE response rate after 2-week domperidone or placebo treatment was 60.3% versus 54.9% for postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) (RR 1.098, 95% CI 0.750–1.607) and 60.6% versus 35.2% for overlapping PDS–epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) (RR 1.722, 95% CI 0.995–2.980). Adverse events were reported by seven patients in the domperidone group and 12 patients in the placebo group. None of the adverse events in the domperidone group were serious.

Conclusion

Domperidone showed a positive pattern regarding OTE response rates after 2-week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD, as well as in subtypes of PDS and overlapping PDS–EPS. No new safety issue was observed.

多潘立酮治疗中国成年功能性消化不良:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
目的:这项初步研究旨在评估多潘立酮治疗根据罗马IV标准诊断的中国功能性消化不良(FD)患者的疗效,包括确定可能对多潘立醇反应更好的FD亚型。方法:本研究于2018年8月至2020年7月在中国的医院进行。该研究包括为期1周的筛选阶段和为期2周的双盲治疗阶段。参与者被随机分配服用10 mg多潘立酮或匹配的安慰剂,每天3次,共14次 天。主要终点是2年后的总体治疗效果(OTE)反应率 数周的治疗。结果:本研究纳入160名患者,每组80名。2后的OTE响应率 与安慰剂(46.0%)相比,多潘立酮(60.7%)的治疗周数更高(相对风险[RR],1.318;95%置信区间[CI],0.972-1.787) 根据FD亚型,多潘立酮和安慰剂的餐后痛苦综合征(PDS)的周数分别为60.3%vs 54.9%(RR,1.098;95%CI,0.750-1.607)和重叠PDS上腹痛综合征(EPS)的周率分别为60.6%vs 35.2%(RR,1.722;95%CI,0.995-2.980)。多潘立酮组有7名患者和安慰剂组有12名患者报告了不良事件。多潘立酮组无严重或意外的不良事件。结论:多潘立酮在2小时后显示出OTE应答率的阳性模式 FD患者以及PDS和重叠PDS-EPS亚型患者的治疗周数与安慰剂相比。未观察到新的安全信号。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信