Impact of Surgical Resection Without Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Dumbbell Tumors on Postoperative Global Spinal Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-29 DOI:10.1177/21925682231212724
Toshiki Okubo, Narihito Nagoshi, Osahiko Tsuji, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Yohei Takahashi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Resection Without Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Dumbbell Tumors on Postoperative Global Spinal Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Toshiki Okubo, Narihito Nagoshi, Osahiko Tsuji, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Yohei Takahashi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe","doi":"10.1177/21925682231212724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated radiographical changes in global spinal sagittal alignment (GSSA) and clinical outcomes after tumor resection without spinal fusion in patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors who were followed up for at least 3 years were included in this study. Variations in the outcome variables were analyzed using individual GSSA parameters measured on radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale (MMCS), Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). To assess the impact of the affected levels on these outcomes, we divided the patients into three groups according to the location of the tumor (upper [T1-4], middle [T5-8], or lower [T9-12] thoracic spine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GSSA parameters (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis [global, upper, middle, and lower], thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt) of all the patients did not change significantly after surgery. Eleven of thirty patients had preoperative gait disturbances but they could walk without support (MMCS grade I or II) at the final follow-up. The JOA score and VAS showed significant postoperative improvements. No statistically significant differences were observed in each postoperative sagittal profile or clinical outcome between the upper, middle, and lower groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor resection without spinal fusion did not affect the various GSSA parameters and resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, indicating that spinal fusion may not always be necessary when resecting thoracic dumbbell tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"790-799"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231212724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective comparative study.

Objectives: This study investigated radiographical changes in global spinal sagittal alignment (GSSA) and clinical outcomes after tumor resection without spinal fusion in patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors.

Methods: Thirty patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors who were followed up for at least 3 years were included in this study. Variations in the outcome variables were analyzed using individual GSSA parameters measured on radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale (MMCS), Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). To assess the impact of the affected levels on these outcomes, we divided the patients into three groups according to the location of the tumor (upper [T1-4], middle [T5-8], or lower [T9-12] thoracic spine).

Results: The GSSA parameters (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis [global, upper, middle, and lower], thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt) of all the patients did not change significantly after surgery. Eleven of thirty patients had preoperative gait disturbances but they could walk without support (MMCS grade I or II) at the final follow-up. The JOA score and VAS showed significant postoperative improvements. No statistically significant differences were observed in each postoperative sagittal profile or clinical outcome between the upper, middle, and lower groups.

Conclusions: Tumor resection without spinal fusion did not affect the various GSSA parameters and resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, indicating that spinal fusion may not always be necessary when resecting thoracic dumbbell tumors.

胸哑铃肿瘤不经脊柱融合术的手术切除对术后全脊柱矢状位对齐和临床结果的影响。
研究设计:回顾性比较研究。目的:本研究探讨了胸部哑铃型肿瘤患者在未进行脊柱融合术的情况下进行肿瘤切除后,整体脊柱矢状位对齐(GSSA)的放射学变化和临床结果。方法:对30例胸部哑铃型肿瘤患者进行了至少3年的随访。使用射线照相测量的个体GSSA参数分析结果变量的变化。使用改良的麦考密克量表(MMCS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估临床结果。为了评估受影响水平对这些结果的影响,我们根据肿瘤的位置将患者分为三组(上[T1-4]、中[T5-8]或下[T9-12]胸椎)。结果:术后所有患者的GSSA参数(颈椎前凸、T1斜率、胸部后凸[全局、上、中、下]、胸腰椎后凸、腰椎前凸、骶骨斜率、骨盆发生率和骨盆倾斜)均无显著变化。30名患者中有11名术前步态障碍,但在最后的随访中,他们可以在没有支撑的情况下行走(MMCS I级或II级)。JOA评分和VAS评分显示术后有显著改善。上组、中组和下组的术后矢状面或临床结果均无统计学显著差异。结论:未经脊柱融合术的肿瘤切除不会影响各种GSSA参数,并产生令人满意的临床结果,这表明在切除胸部哑铃型肿瘤时,脊柱融合术可能并不总是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信