Something Drawn, Something Touched, Something Scrolled: An Exploratory Comparison of Perimeter and Area Interventions Including Kidspiration.

Dino Sossi, Azadeh Jamalian, Shenetta Richardson
{"title":"Something Drawn, Something Touched, Something Scrolled: An Exploratory Comparison of Perimeter and Area Interventions Including Kidspiration.","authors":"Dino Sossi, Azadeh Jamalian, Shenetta Richardson","doi":"10.7916/JMETC.V2I2.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study compared a computer-based mathematics education intervention with two more traditional approaches with the purpose of improving instruction in perimeter and area. Kidspiration software, tile/stick manipulatives and pencil/paper-based copying/drawing of shapes were implemented in a 3rd Grade New York City public school classroom. This study demonstrated student improvement across the three interventions when comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention test scores. Students who engaged with the copying/drawing shapes intervention demonstrated the greatest test score improvement after the intervention, those who used Kidspiration ranked second and tile/stick manipulatives were third. When queried about their perceptions of the efficacy of these interventions, students generally perceived all three of the interventions as being positive in improving their learning of perimeter and area. Developing new methods to address deficiencies in current forms of assessment that would highlight the benefits of non-traditional forms of education, such as technological initiatives, is recommended.","PeriodicalId":30179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JMETC.V2I2.727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This exploratory study compared a computer-based mathematics education intervention with two more traditional approaches with the purpose of improving instruction in perimeter and area. Kidspiration software, tile/stick manipulatives and pencil/paper-based copying/drawing of shapes were implemented in a 3rd Grade New York City public school classroom. This study demonstrated student improvement across the three interventions when comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention test scores. Students who engaged with the copying/drawing shapes intervention demonstrated the greatest test score improvement after the intervention, those who used Kidspiration ranked second and tile/stick manipulatives were third. When queried about their perceptions of the efficacy of these interventions, students generally perceived all three of the interventions as being positive in improving their learning of perimeter and area. Developing new methods to address deficiencies in current forms of assessment that would highlight the benefits of non-traditional forms of education, such as technological initiatives, is recommended.
画的东西,触摸的东西,滚动的东西:周边和区域干预的探索性比较,包括启发。
本探索性研究比较了以计算机为基础的数学教育干预与两种更传统的方法,目的是提高教学的周长和面积。在纽约市公立学校三年级的教室里,孩子们使用了Kidspiration软件、瓦片/棍子操作工具和铅笔/纸上的形状复制/绘图。本研究通过比较干预前和干预后的测试成绩,证明了三种干预措施对学生的改善。参与复制/绘制形状干预的学生在干预后表现出最大的测试成绩提高,使用Kidspiration的学生排名第二,使用贴图/棍子操作的学生排名第三。当被问及他们对这些干预措施的有效性的看法时,学生们普遍认为这三种干预措施对提高他们对周长和面积的学习是积极的。建议发展新的方法来解决目前评价形式的不足,突出非传统教育形式,例如技术倡议的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信