Can Theatre be a Project of Liberation Theology?: Explorations in the Case of a Collaboration in Tanzania

Charles A. Gillespie
{"title":"Can Theatre be a Project of Liberation Theology?: Explorations in the Case of a Collaboration in Tanzania","authors":"Charles A. Gillespie","doi":"10.7916/D8DZ07NT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the summer of 2011, a contingent of graduate students and faculty sourced from Yale University’s Divinity School, School of Drama, and Institute of Sacred Music partnered with the Parapanda Theatre Arts Lab in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Building on the work of Augusto Boal, Parapanda has pioneered using participatory theatre as a means for social change. Their process creates provocative, non-traditional drama that attempts to give voice to instances of social injustice. Yale students joined Parapanda artists for an unprecedented international exchange exploring this unique possibility of theatre-making. An essential component of the Yale/Parapanda experiment tried to bring theatre for social change into conversation with liberation theology. Traditional coursework in Christian and Islamic liberation theologies intermingled with rehearsals and performances, but neither the final performances nor inter-company conversation extensively engaged religious questions. The failure to launch productive religious discourse as a part of the Yale/Parapanda experiment seems to name any theoretical connection “merely cosmetic.” In this paper, I will argue that the resonance between a theology of the oppressed and a theatre of the oppressed go deeper than surface-level similarities. Indeed, the Yale/Parapanda experiment reveals a symbiotic relationship between these disciplines even though discussing religious topics remained elusive and its final performances did not integrate religious content. I will show how participatory theatre reflects the methodology of liberation theology in action and that liberation theology provides a guide for theatre that seeks to combat oppression. In the spirit of liberation theology’s attention to contextual analysis, I will begin with Parapanda’s theatrical process and examples from the Yale/Parapanda experiment. I will then develop a brief theological account for what I believe to be one of the key principles for the success of theatre for social change—the creation of “spaces of freedom.” On these grounds, I will suggest a way to see how participatory theatre for social change, in its historical and dramatic activity, does liberation theology.","PeriodicalId":83394,"journal":{"name":"Union Seminary quarterly review","volume":"64 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Union Seminary quarterly review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8DZ07NT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the summer of 2011, a contingent of graduate students and faculty sourced from Yale University’s Divinity School, School of Drama, and Institute of Sacred Music partnered with the Parapanda Theatre Arts Lab in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Building on the work of Augusto Boal, Parapanda has pioneered using participatory theatre as a means for social change. Their process creates provocative, non-traditional drama that attempts to give voice to instances of social injustice. Yale students joined Parapanda artists for an unprecedented international exchange exploring this unique possibility of theatre-making. An essential component of the Yale/Parapanda experiment tried to bring theatre for social change into conversation with liberation theology. Traditional coursework in Christian and Islamic liberation theologies intermingled with rehearsals and performances, but neither the final performances nor inter-company conversation extensively engaged religious questions. The failure to launch productive religious discourse as a part of the Yale/Parapanda experiment seems to name any theoretical connection “merely cosmetic.” In this paper, I will argue that the resonance between a theology of the oppressed and a theatre of the oppressed go deeper than surface-level similarities. Indeed, the Yale/Parapanda experiment reveals a symbiotic relationship between these disciplines even though discussing religious topics remained elusive and its final performances did not integrate religious content. I will show how participatory theatre reflects the methodology of liberation theology in action and that liberation theology provides a guide for theatre that seeks to combat oppression. In the spirit of liberation theology’s attention to contextual analysis, I will begin with Parapanda’s theatrical process and examples from the Yale/Parapanda experiment. I will then develop a brief theological account for what I believe to be one of the key principles for the success of theatre for social change—the creation of “spaces of freedom.” On these grounds, I will suggest a way to see how participatory theatre for social change, in its historical and dramatic activity, does liberation theology.
戏剧可以是一个解放神学的项目吗?:在坦桑尼亚合作情况下的探索
2011年夏天,来自耶鲁大学神学院、戏剧学院和圣乐学院的研究生和教职员工与坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的帕拉潘达戏剧艺术实验室合作。在奥古斯托·波尔作品的基础上,帕拉潘达率先使用参与式戏剧作为社会变革的手段。他们的过程创造了挑衅性的、非传统的戏剧,试图为社会不公正的实例发出声音。耶鲁大学的学生们与帕拉潘达的艺术家们进行了一次前所未有的国际交流,探索这种独特的戏剧创作的可能性。耶鲁/帕拉潘达实验的一个重要组成部分试图将社会变革的戏剧与解放神学进行对话。传统的基督教和伊斯兰解放神学课程与排练和表演交织在一起,但无论是最后的表演还是公司内部的对话都没有广泛涉及宗教问题。作为耶鲁/帕拉潘达实验的一部分,未能启动富有成效的宗教话语,似乎将任何理论联系命名为“仅仅是表面上的”。在本文中,我将论证被压迫者的神学和被压迫者的戏剧之间的共鸣比表面上的相似更深。事实上,耶鲁和帕拉潘达的实验揭示了这些学科之间的共生关系,尽管讨论宗教话题仍然是难以捉摸的,它的最终表演也没有融入宗教内容。我将展示参与式戏剧是如何反映行动中的解放神学方法论的,以及解放神学为寻求对抗压迫的戏剧提供了指导。本着解放神学对语境分析的关注精神,我将从帕拉潘达的戏剧过程和耶鲁/帕拉潘达实验中的例子开始。然后,我将对我所认为的戏剧促进社会变革成功的关键原则之一——创造“自由空间”——进行简短的神学解释。基于这些理由,我将提出一种方法,来观察社会变革的参与式戏剧,在其历史和戏剧活动中,是如何实现解放神学的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信