Understanding Illicit Insemination and Fertility Fraud, From Patient Experience to Legal Reform

J. Madeira
{"title":"Understanding Illicit Insemination and Fertility Fraud, From Patient Experience to Legal Reform","authors":"J. Madeira","doi":"10.7916/CJGL.V39I1.4559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, several cases have been filed in North America and Europe alleging that fertility physicians inseminated former patients with their own sperm only to have this conduct come to light decades later when their unsuspecting adult children use direct-to-consumer genetic tests and learn that they are not biologically related to their fathers and often that they have multiple half-siblings. For instance, Donald Cline of Indianapolis, Indiana, has over sixty doctor-conceived children, with more continuing to come forward. Although these cases induce disgust, it has thus far proven difficult to hold these physicians legally accountable because their conduct falls within gaps in existing civil and criminal laws. This Article explores the legal contours of fertility fraud cases involving illicit physician inseminations, explaining why it falls through gaps in existing criminal and civil law and why it is essential to take whatever measures are necessary to hold physicians accountable. Part I discusses six physicians who have thus far faced criminal or civil charges for their conduct in North America and explores how artificial insemination has long been a stigmatized practice cloaked in secrecy. Part II discusses how fertility fraud violates various ethical and legal interests of female and male former patients and their doctor-conceived children. Part III assesses how Cline’s illicit inseminations affected parents and progeny and how Cline’s progeny learn of new genetic connections, what they think of Cline and his motivations, how they derive support from one another, their reactions to criminal proceedings against Cline, and why they regard a legislative “fertility fraud” bill as an ideal outcome. Part IV analyzes why it is difficult to hold physicians criminally and civilly liable under existing law, including excerpts from an interview with the prosecutor in the Cline case. Finally, Part V discusses successful efforts to overcome these difficulties through passing fertility fraud legislation in Indiana and Texas.","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":"39 1","pages":"110-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CJGL.V39I1.4559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently, several cases have been filed in North America and Europe alleging that fertility physicians inseminated former patients with their own sperm only to have this conduct come to light decades later when their unsuspecting adult children use direct-to-consumer genetic tests and learn that they are not biologically related to their fathers and often that they have multiple half-siblings. For instance, Donald Cline of Indianapolis, Indiana, has over sixty doctor-conceived children, with more continuing to come forward. Although these cases induce disgust, it has thus far proven difficult to hold these physicians legally accountable because their conduct falls within gaps in existing civil and criminal laws. This Article explores the legal contours of fertility fraud cases involving illicit physician inseminations, explaining why it falls through gaps in existing criminal and civil law and why it is essential to take whatever measures are necessary to hold physicians accountable. Part I discusses six physicians who have thus far faced criminal or civil charges for their conduct in North America and explores how artificial insemination has long been a stigmatized practice cloaked in secrecy. Part II discusses how fertility fraud violates various ethical and legal interests of female and male former patients and their doctor-conceived children. Part III assesses how Cline’s illicit inseminations affected parents and progeny and how Cline’s progeny learn of new genetic connections, what they think of Cline and his motivations, how they derive support from one another, their reactions to criminal proceedings against Cline, and why they regard a legislative “fertility fraud” bill as an ideal outcome. Part IV analyzes why it is difficult to hold physicians criminally and civilly liable under existing law, including excerpts from an interview with the prosecutor in the Cline case. Finally, Part V discusses successful efforts to overcome these difficulties through passing fertility fraud legislation in Indiana and Texas.
从患者经验到法律改革,了解非法人工授精和生育欺诈
最近,在北美和欧洲提起了几起案件,指控生育医生用自己的精子给以前的病人人工授精,但几十年后,当他们毫无疑心的成年子女直接对消费者进行基因检测时,发现他们与父亲没有血缘关系,而且往往有多个同父异母的兄弟姐妹时,这种行为才被曝光。例如,印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的唐纳德·克莱恩(Donald Cline)有60多名医生怀上的孩子,还有更多的孩子继续出生。尽管这些案件令人厌恶,但迄今为止,事实证明很难追究这些医生的法律责任,因为他们的行为属于现行民事和刑事法律的空白。本文探讨了涉及非法医生人工授精的生育欺诈案件的法律轮廓,解释了为什么它在现有的刑事和民事法律中存在空白,以及为什么必须采取任何必要措施追究医生的责任。第一部分讨论了迄今为止在北美因其行为而面临刑事或民事指控的六位医生,并探讨了人工授精如何长期以来一直是一种隐藏在秘密中的耻辱做法。第二部分讨论了生育欺诈如何侵犯了女性和男性前患者及其医生怀孕的孩子的各种道德和法律利益。第三部分评估克莱恩的非法人工授精如何影响父母和后代,克莱恩的后代如何了解新的基因联系,他们如何看待克莱恩和他的动机,他们如何获得彼此的支持,他们对针对克莱恩的刑事诉讼的反应,以及为什么他们认为立法“生育欺诈”法案是一个理想的结果。第四部分分析了为什么在现行法律下很难追究医生的刑事和民事责任,包括对克莱恩案件中检察官的采访摘录。最后,第五部分讨论了在印第安纳州和德克萨斯州通过生育欺诈立法来克服这些困难的成功努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信