Accuracy in Analysis: The Role of Standard Reference Materials

S. Rasberry
{"title":"Accuracy in Analysis: The Role of Standard Reference Materials","authors":"S. Rasberry","doi":"10.6028/jres.093.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probably it is the last of these questions that brings the greatest difficulty and the most soul searching to the analyst. If this were not the case, why are there so many cars in chemistry building parking lots on weekends and holidays? Why are analysts often reluctant to report results without \"just one more retest\"? This paper will attempt to pick apart some of these questions. While it may answer none of them conclusively, it is aimed at demonstrating the role of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) in the analyst's pursuit of accuracy. In the case of trace analysis near the detection limit of state-of-the-art methods, certifiers of reference materials face a very special problem: certified error limits often seem unacceptably high when considered on a relative basis. This paper will include a brief discussion of this problem.","PeriodicalId":17082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","volume":"93 1","pages":"213 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Probably it is the last of these questions that brings the greatest difficulty and the most soul searching to the analyst. If this were not the case, why are there so many cars in chemistry building parking lots on weekends and holidays? Why are analysts often reluctant to report results without "just one more retest"? This paper will attempt to pick apart some of these questions. While it may answer none of them conclusively, it is aimed at demonstrating the role of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) in the analyst's pursuit of accuracy. In the case of trace analysis near the detection limit of state-of-the-art methods, certifiers of reference materials face a very special problem: certified error limits often seem unacceptably high when considered on a relative basis. This paper will include a brief discussion of this problem.
分析中的准确性:标准参考物质的作用
也许正是最后一个问题给分析师带来了最大的困难和最深刻的反思。如果不是这样的话,为什么在周末和节假日化学大楼的停车场会有这么多车呢?为什么分析师往往不愿在“再重测一次”之前报告业绩?本文将试图对其中的一些问题进行分析。虽然它可能不能最终回答这些问题,但它旨在展示标准参考物质(srm)在分析师追求准确性方面的作用。在接近最先进方法检测极限的痕量分析的情况下,标准物质的认证者面临一个非常特殊的问题:在相对基础上考虑时,认证的误差极限往往高得令人无法接受。本文将包括对这个问题的简要讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信