Relationship between Simulation Design Characteristics and Clinical Reasoning Competence: Multiple Additive Moderating Effects of Teaching Effectiveness and Students' Anxiety on Nursing Students
{"title":"Relationship between Simulation Design Characteristics and Clinical Reasoning Competence: Multiple Additive Moderating Effects of Teaching Effectiveness and Students' Anxiety on Nursing Students","authors":"Kyung-In Cheon, H. Hur","doi":"10.7475/kjan.2021.33.4.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the moderating effect of teaching effectiveness and students ’ anxiety in the relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence among nursing students. Methods: The participants were 123 nursing students who underwent simulation practice. Data were collected from September 1 to October 30, 2020 using self-report questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson ’ s correlation coefficient, and SPSS PROCESS Macro program (to study the multiple additive moderation effect). Results: Significant positive correlations were observed between clinical reasoning competence and simulation design characteristics (r=.57, p < .001), clinical reasoning competence and teaching effectiveness (r=.49, p < .001), while negative correlations were observed between clinical reasoning competence and students ’ anxiety (r=-.33, p < .001). Teaching effectiveness and students ’ anxiety had a multiple additive moderating effect on the relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence among the nursing students (F=15.10, p < .001). Conclusion: The relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence differed depending on the students ’ anxiety. To improve the clinical reasoning competence of nursing students in simulation practice, developing interventions and techniques to manage students ’ anxiety levels are important.","PeriodicalId":38646,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2021.33.4.322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the moderating effect of teaching effectiveness and students ’ anxiety in the relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence among nursing students. Methods: The participants were 123 nursing students who underwent simulation practice. Data were collected from September 1 to October 30, 2020 using self-report questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson ’ s correlation coefficient, and SPSS PROCESS Macro program (to study the multiple additive moderation effect). Results: Significant positive correlations were observed between clinical reasoning competence and simulation design characteristics (r=.57, p < .001), clinical reasoning competence and teaching effectiveness (r=.49, p < .001), while negative correlations were observed between clinical reasoning competence and students ’ anxiety (r=-.33, p < .001). Teaching effectiveness and students ’ anxiety had a multiple additive moderating effect on the relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence among the nursing students (F=15.10, p < .001). Conclusion: The relationship between simulation design characteristics and clinical reasoning competence differed depending on the students ’ anxiety. To improve the clinical reasoning competence of nursing students in simulation practice, developing interventions and techniques to manage students ’ anxiety levels are important.
目的:本研究旨在探讨教学效能和学生焦虑在护理学生模拟设计特征与临床推理能力关系中的调节作用。方法:以123名护生为研究对象,进行模拟实习。数据收集时间为2020年9月1日至10月30日,采用自我报告问卷。采用描述性统计、独立t检验、Pearson相关系数和SPSS PROCESS Macro程序(研究多重加性调节效应)对收集到的数据进行分析。结果:临床推理能力与模拟设计特征呈显著正相关(r=。57, p < .001),临床推理能力和教学效果(r=。49, p < .001),而临床推理能力与学生焦虑呈负相关(r=-。33, p < 0.001)。教学效果和学生焦虑对护生模拟设计特征与临床推理能力的关系有多重加性调节作用(F=15.10, p < .001)。结论:模拟设计特征与临床推理能力的关系因学生焦虑程度的不同而不同。为了提高护生在模拟实习中的临床推理能力,制定干预措施和技术来管理学生的焦虑水平是很重要的。