Lucrative art of disaster: fetishized apocalypse, culture of fear and hurricane 'Tammy' in Nathaniel Rich's Odds Against Tomorrow

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Parisa Changizi
{"title":"Lucrative art of disaster: fetishized apocalypse, culture of fear and hurricane 'Tammy' in Nathaniel Rich's Odds Against Tomorrow","authors":"Parisa Changizi","doi":"10.5817/bse2021-1-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an eye to the visibly growing predilection for imagining humanity under siege in a rather disquietingly vulnerable state since Hiroshima’s trauma up until the contemporary times, the present paper attempts to examine Nathaniel Rich’s Odds Against Tomorrow (2013) through an ecological lens that takes fear as its central thematic concern with connection to the perception of (eco-)apocalypse. Ecological thinking, whether fictional or factual, seems to have been closely linked to the narratives of the future with an underlying Cassandran foreboding spirit. The narrativization of proleptically apocalyptic visions of human civilization, though drenched in fear and anxiety, essentially serves a survival-enhancing purpose. However, the over-zealous embrace of the catastrophic end-of-times prophecies seems paradoxically to have an adverse effect trapping us in a web of fear-induced paralysis, desensitization through repetitive exposure, and vulnerable susceptibility towards opportunistic maneuverings. Odds Against Tomorrow, dealing with the most common apocalyptic fears of the contemporary age, grapples profoundly with the wisdom (or lack thereof) of a culture alarmingly drenched in fear and acutely obsessed with risk-aversion.","PeriodicalId":35227,"journal":{"name":"Brno Studies in English","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brno Studies in English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/bse2021-1-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With an eye to the visibly growing predilection for imagining humanity under siege in a rather disquietingly vulnerable state since Hiroshima’s trauma up until the contemporary times, the present paper attempts to examine Nathaniel Rich’s Odds Against Tomorrow (2013) through an ecological lens that takes fear as its central thematic concern with connection to the perception of (eco-)apocalypse. Ecological thinking, whether fictional or factual, seems to have been closely linked to the narratives of the future with an underlying Cassandran foreboding spirit. The narrativization of proleptically apocalyptic visions of human civilization, though drenched in fear and anxiety, essentially serves a survival-enhancing purpose. However, the over-zealous embrace of the catastrophic end-of-times prophecies seems paradoxically to have an adverse effect trapping us in a web of fear-induced paralysis, desensitization through repetitive exposure, and vulnerable susceptibility towards opportunistic maneuverings. Odds Against Tomorrow, dealing with the most common apocalyptic fears of the contemporary age, grapples profoundly with the wisdom (or lack thereof) of a culture alarmingly drenched in fear and acutely obsessed with risk-aversion.
有利可图的灾难艺术:天启崇拜、恐惧文化和飓风“塔米”,纳撒尼尔·里奇的《明天的赔率》
从广岛的创伤到当代,人们越来越倾向于想象人类处于一种相当令人不安的脆弱状态,本文试图通过生态视角来审视纳撒尼尔·里奇(Nathaniel Rich)的《明天的可能性》(Odds Against Tomorrow, 2013),该视角将恐惧作为其与(生态)启示录感知相关的中心主题。生态思维,无论是虚构的还是真实的,似乎都与对未来的叙述密切相关,并带有一种潜在的Cassandran预感精神。对人类文明的预言式末世图景的叙述,虽然浸透着恐惧和焦虑,但本质上是为了增强生存能力。然而,过度狂热地拥抱灾难性的末日预言似乎自相矛盾地产生了不利影响,使我们陷入恐惧导致的瘫痪,通过反复暴露而脱敏,以及对机会主义操纵的脆弱易感性的网络中。《反对明天的赔率》处理了当代最常见的世界末日恐惧,深刻地探讨了一个充满恐惧和极度厌恶风险的文化的智慧(或缺乏智慧)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brno Studies in English
Brno Studies in English Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信