Epidural anesthesia does not increase the incidences of urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition after ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy.

Y. Kau, Yu-Hao Lee, Jihn-Yih Li, Chit Chen, S. Wong, T. K. Wong
{"title":"Epidural anesthesia does not increase the incidences of urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition after ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy.","authors":"Y. Kau, Yu-Hao Lee, Jihn-Yih Li, Chit Chen, S. Wong, T. K. Wong","doi":"10.6955/AAS.200306.0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThis randomized, prospective study was designed to evaluate the role of various anesthesias in postoperative urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition in patients receiving hemorrhoidectomy on ambulatory basis.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn a randomized order, 128 ambulatory patients, ASA physical status I or II, were divided into two groups to receive hemorrhoidectomy under epidural or local anesthesia. In all patients, the intraoperative intravenous fluid given was limited to 200 ml +/- 2 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate solution. Patients were requested to void urine voluntarily before discharge. The incidences of postoperative urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition were evaluated by telephone interview 24 hours after surgery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nNeither the incidence of urinary retention, nor the incidence of hesitancy in micturition was significantly different between the two groups. Patients with age over 50 had a significantly higher incidence of hesitancy in micturition than younger patients. The incidence of hesitancy in micturition seemed higher in male patients (31.3%) than that in females (15.6%), but the difference was not statistically different (P = 0.0585).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWith judicious intraoperative fluid restriction and voluntary voiding before discharge, epidural anesthesia does not increase the incidence of postoperative urinary retention or hesitancy in micturition following ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy.","PeriodicalId":79312,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":"41 2 1","pages":"61-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6955/AAS.200306.0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND This randomized, prospective study was designed to evaluate the role of various anesthesias in postoperative urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition in patients receiving hemorrhoidectomy on ambulatory basis. METHODS In a randomized order, 128 ambulatory patients, ASA physical status I or II, were divided into two groups to receive hemorrhoidectomy under epidural or local anesthesia. In all patients, the intraoperative intravenous fluid given was limited to 200 ml +/- 2 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate solution. Patients were requested to void urine voluntarily before discharge. The incidences of postoperative urinary retention and hesitancy in micturition were evaluated by telephone interview 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS Neither the incidence of urinary retention, nor the incidence of hesitancy in micturition was significantly different between the two groups. Patients with age over 50 had a significantly higher incidence of hesitancy in micturition than younger patients. The incidence of hesitancy in micturition seemed higher in male patients (31.3%) than that in females (15.6%), but the difference was not statistically different (P = 0.0585). CONCLUSIONS With judicious intraoperative fluid restriction and voluntary voiding before discharge, epidural anesthesia does not increase the incidence of postoperative urinary retention or hesitancy in micturition following ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy.
硬膜外麻醉不会增加痔切除术后尿潴留和排尿犹豫的发生率。
背景:这项随机、前瞻性研究旨在评估各种麻醉在痔疮切除术患者术后尿潴留和排尿犹豫中的作用。方法将128例ASA身体状态为I或II的非住院患者随机分为硬膜外或局麻两组,分别行痔切除术。在所有患者中,术中静脉给予的液体限制为200 ml +/- 2 ml/kg/h乳酸林格氏液。要求患者在出院前自行排尿。术后24小时通过电话访谈评估尿潴留和排尿犹豫的发生率。结果两组患者尿潴留发生率和排尿犹豫发生率均无显著差异。50岁以上患者排尿犹豫的发生率明显高于年轻患者。男性患者排尿犹豫发生率(31.3%)高于女性患者(15.6%),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.0585)。结论术中合理限液,出院前自觉排尿,硬膜外麻醉不会增加门诊痔切除术后尿潴留或排尿犹豫的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信