Effects of force fields for refining protein NMR structures with atomistic force fields and generalized-Born implicit solvent model

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
J. Jee
{"title":"Effects of force fields for refining protein NMR structures with atomistic force fields and generalized-Born implicit solvent model","authors":"J. Jee","doi":"10.6564/JKMRS.2014.18.1.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become mature enabling close approximation of the real behaviors of biomolecules. In biomolecular NMR field, atomistic MD simulation coupled with generalized implicit solvent model (GBIS) has contributed to improving the qualities of NMR structures in the refinement stagewith experimental restraints. Here all-atom force fields play important roles in defining the optimal positions between atoms and angles, resulting in more precise and accurate structures. Despite successful applications in refining NMR structure, however, the research that has studied the influence of force fields in GBIS is limited. In this study, the we compared qualities of NMR structures of two model proteins, ubiquitin and GB1, under a series of AMBER force fieldsff99SB, ff99SB-ILDN, ff99SB-NMR, ff12SB, and ff13with experimental restraints. The root mean square deviations of backbone atoms and packing scores that reflect the apparent structural qualities were almost indistinguishable except ff13. Qualitative comparison of parameters, however, indicates that ff99SB-ILDN is more recommendable, at least in the cases of ubiquitin and GB1.","PeriodicalId":17414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society","volume":"18 1","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6564/JKMRS.2014.18.1.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become mature enabling close approximation of the real behaviors of biomolecules. In biomolecular NMR field, atomistic MD simulation coupled with generalized implicit solvent model (GBIS) has contributed to improving the qualities of NMR structures in the refinement stagewith experimental restraints. Here all-atom force fields play important roles in defining the optimal positions between atoms and angles, resulting in more precise and accurate structures. Despite successful applications in refining NMR structure, however, the research that has studied the influence of force fields in GBIS is limited. In this study, the we compared qualities of NMR structures of two model proteins, ubiquitin and GB1, under a series of AMBER force fieldsff99SB, ff99SB-ILDN, ff99SB-NMR, ff12SB, and ff13with experimental restraints. The root mean square deviations of backbone atoms and packing scores that reflect the apparent structural qualities were almost indistinguishable except ff13. Qualitative comparison of parameters, however, indicates that ff99SB-ILDN is more recommendable, at least in the cases of ubiquitin and GB1.
用原子力场和广义玻恩隐式溶剂模型对蛋白质核磁共振结构的影响
原子分子动力学(MD)模拟技术已经发展成熟,能够很好地模拟生物分子的真实行为。在生物分子核磁共振领域,原子MD模拟与广义隐式溶剂模型(GBIS)相结合有助于在实验约束下提高核磁共振结构的精细化质量。在这里,全原子力场在确定原子之间的最佳位置和角度方面起着重要作用,从而产生更精确和精确的结构。然而,尽管在核磁共振结构精炼方面取得了成功的应用,但对GBIS中力场影响的研究仍然有限。在本研究中,我们比较了泛素和GB1两种模型蛋白在AMBER电磁场ff99SB、ff99SB- ildn、ff99SB-NMR、ff12SB和ff13下的NMR结构质量,并进行了实验约束。除了ff13外,反映表观结构质量的主链原子的均方根偏差和堆积分数几乎无法区分。然而,参数的定性比较表明,至少在泛素和GB1的情况下,ff99SB-ILDN更值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society
Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信