Construyendo escuelas resilientes: La educación flexible, la integración y la COVID-19

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anamaría García-Díaz
{"title":"Construyendo escuelas resilientes: La educación flexible, la integración y la COVID-19","authors":"Anamaría García-Díaz","doi":"10.5944/REEC.38.2021.28840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper seeks to show the importance alternative pedagogical methods had when trying to reopen schools on-site and online. Resilient schools were not created in this pandemic. In previous natural disasters, educational institutions needed to used online resources to maintain schools open. A literature review is presented, aiming for answers on inclusion in flexible school settings, solutions for the digital divide and different responses to the crisis produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, Australia and New Zealand cases are presented, as well as introducing the flexischooling phenomenon and the digital divide. Both Australia and New Zealand recognise the rights for families to homeschool or to take children to alternative educational institutions, therefore, is legal. In the pair, it is observed how this legal status of alternative educational options both online and flexible, has strengthened the governmental response on closing the digital gap. Therefore, their reaction when lockdowns were ruled was significantly fast, especially in New Zealand. In conclusion, the article offers an interesting debate on the need for on-site education or flexibility when creating inclusive schools and critical thinkers, presenting both sides of the conversation. Lastly, it is highlighted the need to upgrade the school system to enhance a resilient response in future crisis.","PeriodicalId":54007,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/REEC.38.2021.28840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The paper seeks to show the importance alternative pedagogical methods had when trying to reopen schools on-site and online. Resilient schools were not created in this pandemic. In previous natural disasters, educational institutions needed to used online resources to maintain schools open. A literature review is presented, aiming for answers on inclusion in flexible school settings, solutions for the digital divide and different responses to the crisis produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, Australia and New Zealand cases are presented, as well as introducing the flexischooling phenomenon and the digital divide. Both Australia and New Zealand recognise the rights for families to homeschool or to take children to alternative educational institutions, therefore, is legal. In the pair, it is observed how this legal status of alternative educational options both online and flexible, has strengthened the governmental response on closing the digital gap. Therefore, their reaction when lockdowns were ruled was significantly fast, especially in New Zealand. In conclusion, the article offers an interesting debate on the need for on-site education or flexibility when creating inclusive schools and critical thinkers, presenting both sides of the conversation. Lastly, it is highlighted the need to upgrade the school system to enhance a resilient response in future crisis.
建设弹性学校:灵活教育、融合和COVID-19
本文试图表明,当试图重新开放学校现场和在线替代教学方法的重要性。在这次大流行中没有建立有复原力的学校。在以前的自然灾害中,教育机构需要使用在线资源来维持学校的开放。提出了一项文献综述,旨在回答灵活学校环境中的包容性问题、数字鸿沟的解决方案以及对COVID-19大流行产生的危机的不同应对措施。因此,本文介绍了澳大利亚和新西兰的案例,并介绍了弹性教育现象和数字鸿沟。澳大利亚和新西兰都承认家庭在家教育或将孩子送到其他教育机构的权利,因此,这是合法的。在这对案例中,我们可以观察到,在线和灵活的替代教育选择的法律地位如何加强了政府在缩小数字鸿沟方面的反应。因此,他们对封锁的反应非常快,特别是在新西兰。总之,本文就创建包容性学校和批判性思考者时是否需要现场教育或灵活性进行了有趣的辩论,展示了对话的双方。最后,强调有必要升级学校系统,以加强对未来危机的弹性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada
Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
19
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信