Quasi-markets Targets and the Evaluation of Nursing-home Funding in the Valencian Region

IF 0.7 4区经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI:10.7866/HPE-RPE.16.1.1

Amadeo Fuenmayor, R. Granell, M. Á. Tortosa

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Spanish long term care is in danger, therefore we propose a change in the nursing home funding sys¬tem. We use as an example the extremely complex nursing home financing system of Valencian Region. In this region, there are many funding mechanisms: two types of public subsidies, two different acces¬sibility plans, a voucher scheme and a cash benefit approach related to residential service. We evaluate these methods through the quasi-market theory. We find that these approaches have negative impact on equity, efficiency and freedom of choice and we propose a new, homogeneous financing method for all nursing homes through voucher.

查看原文本刊更多论文

巴伦西亚地区养老院资助的准市场目标与评价

西班牙的长期护理处于危险之中，因此我们建议改变养老院的资助制度。我们以巴伦西亚地区极其复杂的养老院融资体系为例。在这个地区，有许多资助机制:两种类型的公共补贴，两种不同的无障碍计划，代金券计划和与住宅服务相关的现金福利方法。我们通过准市场理论对这些方法进行了评价。我们发现这些方式对公平、效率和选择自由产生了负面影响，并提出了一种新的、同质化的养老机构代金券融资方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics welcomes submissions on all areas of public economics. We seek to publish original and innovative research, applied and theoretical, related to the economic analysis of Government intervention. For example, but not exclusively: Taxation, Redistribution, Health, Education, Pensions, Governance, Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Federalism. In addition to regular submissions, the journal welcomes submissions of: -Survey Reviews, containing surveys of the literature regarding issues of interest in the Public Economics field; -Policy oriented reviews, showing the current contributions of Public Economics in relation to relevant contemporary issues affecting public decision-makers in the real world (Policy Watch); -Comments of previously published articles. Contributions to this section should be limited to a maximum of 2 000 words (12 pages). If deemed adequate, the authors of the commented article will be given the opportunity to react in a Reply. Both Comment and Reply will be published together. Articles for the Survey Reviews and Policy Watch section are subject to the same double blind reviwing procedure. The adequacy of Comments submitted for publication will be evaluated by the Executive Editors.