Puella est domina sui corporis

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5840/studneoar20221924

Sven K. Knebel

{"title":"Puella est domina sui corporis","authors":"Sven K. Knebel","doi":"10.5840/studneoar20221924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Who owns the girl’s body, the parents, or the daughter herself? In Catholic casuistry, this issue has not only been occasionally touched upon, it has been topical among the commentators on Aquinas (STh II-II, q. 154, a. 6) from the 16th up to the 18th centuries. Nevertheless, modern scholarship ignores this big dispute. The distortion of early modern history in consequence thereof precludes a fair appraisal of the achievements of the Christian schools within the Habsburgian commonwealth. Whereas the Iberian Peninsula was the theatre of the endeavour here described (Domingo de Soto OP, Luis de Molina SJ, Gabriel Vázquez SJ, Juan de Lugo SJ, the Salmantine Carmelites), Jansenist France was forward in defeating it. The quarrel about this issue gains an additional interest by the observation that it represents the rare case where the schoolmen themselves had the keen feeling that the stand they took represented a divide between two ages, medieval and modern, viz. Pre-Tridentine and Post-Tridentine. The main purpose of the present paper, then, is to render a necessary piece of apologetics. Its focus is on the deplorable situation in which we presently are due to the rotten feminist convictions about how things went.","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Neoaristotelica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20221924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Who owns the girl’s body, the parents, or the daughter herself? In Catholic casuistry, this issue has not only been occasionally touched upon, it has been topical among the commentators on Aquinas (STh II-II, q. 154, a. 6) from the 16th up to the 18th centuries. Nevertheless, modern scholarship ignores this big dispute. The distortion of early modern history in consequence thereof precludes a fair appraisal of the achievements of the Christian schools within the Habsburgian commonwealth. Whereas the Iberian Peninsula was the theatre of the endeavour here described (Domingo de Soto OP, Luis de Molina SJ, Gabriel Vázquez SJ, Juan de Lugo SJ, the Salmantine Carmelites), Jansenist France was forward in defeating it. The quarrel about this issue gains an additional interest by the observation that it represents the rare case where the schoolmen themselves had the keen feeling that the stand they took represented a divide between two ages, medieval and modern, viz. Pre-Tridentine and Post-Tridentine. The main purpose of the present paper, then, is to render a necessary piece of apologetics. Its focus is on the deplorable situation in which we presently are due to the rotten feminist convictions about how things went.

查看原文本刊更多论文

女孩是她主人的身体。

谁拥有女孩的身体，父母，还是女儿自己?在天主教的诡辩中，这个问题不仅偶尔被触及，而且从16世纪到18世纪，它一直是阿奎那(s5 II-II, q. 154, a. 6)评论员之间的话题。然而，现代学术界忽视了这一重大争议。由此造成的对早期近代史的歪曲妨碍了对哈布斯堡联邦内基督教学校成就的公正评价。尽管伊比利亚半岛是这里描述的努力的舞台(多明戈·德·索托OP，路易斯·德·莫利纳SJ，加布里埃尔Vázquez SJ，胡安·德·卢戈SJ，萨尔曼特加尔默罗会)，詹森派的法国在击败它方面走在前面。关于这个问题的争论引起了额外的兴趣，因为它代表了一个罕见的情况，即经院学者自己强烈地感觉到，他们所采取的立场代表了两个时代的分裂，中世纪和现代，即前特伦丁和后特伦丁。因此，本文的主要目的是提供必要的辩护。它关注的是我们目前所处的可悲局面，这是由于对事情发展的腐朽女权主义信念造成的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studia Neoaristotelica Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Studia Neoaristotelica is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to the promotion of Aristotelian philosophy broadly conceived, drawing on the rich legacy of the scholastic tradition and contemporary analytical metaphysics. Special emphasis is placed on the most advanced forms of scholastic thought that emerged during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. Our vision is to work toward a philosophical synthesis of analytic and scholastic methods and ideas, providing a contribution to Christian philosophy as well as wider secular thought. The journal is published by Editiones Scholasticae and the University of South Bohemia Faculty of Theology.