Zavádění předmětů v aristotelismu

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5840/studneoar20221946

Prokop Sousedík

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to contest the Aristotelian notion that the objects of metaphysics, mathematics and physics are all abstract, which is the reason why these disciplines constitute a homogeneous class. For a reflection on the way how objects are introduced into scientific discourse leads to the conclusion that some of these objects (especially the mathematical ones) are fictions of reason an that their nature is defined purely by their mutual relationships. From this it follows that, far from being theoretical sciences, the respective disciplines are justifiedly classified as arts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

亚里士多德主义主题介绍

本文的主要目的是反驳亚里士多德的观点，即形而上学、数学和物理学的对象都是抽象的，这是这些学科构成同质类的原因。因为反思对象是如何被引入科学话语的，会得出这样的结论:其中一些对象(尤其是数学对象)是理性的虚构，它们的性质纯粹是由它们的相互关系来定义的。由此可见，这两门学科远不是理论科学，而是被合理地归类为艺术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studia Neoaristotelica Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Studia Neoaristotelica is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to the promotion of Aristotelian philosophy broadly conceived, drawing on the rich legacy of the scholastic tradition and contemporary analytical metaphysics. Special emphasis is placed on the most advanced forms of scholastic thought that emerged during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. Our vision is to work toward a philosophical synthesis of analytic and scholastic methods and ideas, providing a contribution to Christian philosophy as well as wider secular thought. The journal is published by Editiones Scholasticae and the University of South Bohemia Faculty of Theology.