Global and Regional Longitudinal Strains Predict Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Mitral Valve Repair: A Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Study

M. Esmaeilzadeh., Hedieh Alimi, S. Hosseini, N. Samiei, Mozhgan Parsaee
{"title":"Global and Regional Longitudinal Strains Predict Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Mitral Valve Repair: A Two Dimensional Speckle Tracking Study","authors":"M. Esmaeilzadeh., Hedieh Alimi, S. Hosseini, N. Samiei, Mozhgan Parsaee","doi":"10.5812/RIJM.41456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It has been well documented that reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has adverse effect on the outcome of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after mitral valve repair (MVr). However, the best method for early detection of LV dysfunction in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with MR still has not been established. Recently two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) has been used to identify subclinical alterations of myocardial deformation in many clinical settings. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the value of regional and global LV two dimensional strains to predict postoperative LV dysfunction after MVr. Methods: Twenty six patients with severe MR were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to their postoperative LVEF difference, those with a post-op LVEF reduction of < 10% at 3 months (Group 1), and those with post-op LVEF reduction of ≥ 10% at 3 months (Group 2). All data were measured after 3 months follow-up and compared with pre-operative measures. Results: The occurrence of post-operative LV dysfunction was significantly related to left ventricular end-systolic dimension index (LVESDI), NYHA functional class and global longitudinal strain (GLS). A cut-off value of 19% for GLS could predict post-op LV dysfunction with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 77%. In addition a cut-off value of 17.7% for long axis strain with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 77% and a cut off value of -20% for 2-chamber strain with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity 83% could predict LV dysfunction after MVr. Conclusions: Among all measured data LV global longitudinal strain seems to be the most sensitive predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction in patients with severe MR and normal LVEF after surgical repair.","PeriodicalId":20994,"journal":{"name":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/RIJM.41456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: It has been well documented that reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has adverse effect on the outcome of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after mitral valve repair (MVr). However, the best method for early detection of LV dysfunction in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with MR still has not been established. Recently two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) has been used to identify subclinical alterations of myocardial deformation in many clinical settings. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the value of regional and global LV two dimensional strains to predict postoperative LV dysfunction after MVr. Methods: Twenty six patients with severe MR were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to their postoperative LVEF difference, those with a post-op LVEF reduction of < 10% at 3 months (Group 1), and those with post-op LVEF reduction of ≥ 10% at 3 months (Group 2). All data were measured after 3 months follow-up and compared with pre-operative measures. Results: The occurrence of post-operative LV dysfunction was significantly related to left ventricular end-systolic dimension index (LVESDI), NYHA functional class and global longitudinal strain (GLS). A cut-off value of 19% for GLS could predict post-op LV dysfunction with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 77%. In addition a cut-off value of 17.7% for long axis strain with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 77% and a cut off value of -20% for 2-chamber strain with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity 83% could predict LV dysfunction after MVr. Conclusions: Among all measured data LV global longitudinal strain seems to be the most sensitive predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction in patients with severe MR and normal LVEF after surgical repair.
整体和区域纵向应变预测二尖瓣修复后左心室功能障碍:二维斑点跟踪研究
背景:已有文献表明,降低左室射血分数(LVEF)对严重二尖瓣修复(MVr)后二尖瓣返流(MR)患者的预后有不利影响。然而,对于无症状或轻度症状的MR患者,早期发现左室功能障碍的最佳方法仍未确定。最近二维斑点跟踪超声心动图(2DSTE)已被用于识别亚临床改变的心肌变形在许多临床设置。目的:我们的目的是评估局部和整体左室二维菌株预测MVr术后左室功能障碍的价值。方法:对26例重症MR患者进行评价。根据术后LVEF差异将患者分为术后LVEF降低< 10%组(第1组)和术后LVEF降低≥10%组(第2组)。所有数据均在随访3个月后测量,并与术前数据进行比较。结果:术后左室功能障碍的发生与左室收缩末期尺寸指数(LVESDI)、NYHA功能分级及整体纵应变(GLS)显著相关。GLS的临界值为19%,可预测术后左室功能障碍,敏感性为89%,特异性为77%。长轴应变的临界值为17.7%,敏感性为78%,特异性为77%;2室应变的临界值为-20%,敏感性为77%,特异性为83%,可预测MVr后左室功能障碍。结论:在所有测量数据中,左室整体纵向应变似乎是严重MR患者术后左室功能障碍和手术修复后左室功能正常患者术后左室功能障碍最敏感的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Razavi International Journal of Medicine aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and medical sciences. The Razavi International Journal of Medicine is an international, English language, peer-reviewed, open access, free access journal dealing with general Medicine and medical sciences, clinical and basic studies, public health, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the education and research department, Razavi Hospital and is published quarterly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信