The professional reference group in the opinions of Polish accountants who prepare financial reporting information

Dominika Korzeniowska, E. Jaworska, E. Maruszewska, Nelli Artienwicz
{"title":"The professional reference group in the opinions of Polish accountants who prepare financial reporting information","authors":"Dominika Korzeniowska, E. Jaworska, E. Maruszewska, Nelli Artienwicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to present professional reference groups that exist in accountants' minds. These groups are the source of values, norms, and behaviours.\nMethodology/approach: The qualitative research was conducted in the form of in-depth interviews with 38 accountants with at least three years of professional experience in ac-counting offices or who were in charge of preparing financial information in non-financial entities.\nFindings: The respondents' opinions indicate the presence of three dimensions that constitute the basis for identifying the professional reference groups: 1) positive and negative, 2) a group of older (more experienced) and younger (less experienced) account-ants, and 3) different perceptions of accountants who work in accounting service offices and those employed in accounting departments in non-financial entities. The identified reference groups are both normative and comparative, although the normative aspect seems to dominate.\nResearch limitations/implications: Limitations of the study result from the method used (qualitative research) and the characteristics of the respondents, who were account-ants working in Poland. Moreover, the reference groups were identified only in terms of professional reference groups, disregarding broader social reference groups.\nOriginality/value: The article describes the first study to identify reference groups among accountants, which opens a new dimension to behavioral research in accounting.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53342,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to present professional reference groups that exist in accountants' minds. These groups are the source of values, norms, and behaviours. Methodology/approach: The qualitative research was conducted in the form of in-depth interviews with 38 accountants with at least three years of professional experience in ac-counting offices or who were in charge of preparing financial information in non-financial entities. Findings: The respondents' opinions indicate the presence of three dimensions that constitute the basis for identifying the professional reference groups: 1) positive and negative, 2) a group of older (more experienced) and younger (less experienced) account-ants, and 3) different perceptions of accountants who work in accounting service offices and those employed in accounting departments in non-financial entities. The identified reference groups are both normative and comparative, although the normative aspect seems to dominate. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study result from the method used (qualitative research) and the characteristics of the respondents, who were account-ants working in Poland. Moreover, the reference groups were identified only in terms of professional reference groups, disregarding broader social reference groups. Originality/value: The article describes the first study to identify reference groups among accountants, which opens a new dimension to behavioral research in accounting.
专业参考小组的意见,波兰会计师编制财务报告信息
目的:本研究的目的是呈现存在于会计人员心中的专业参考群体。这些群体是价值观、规范和行为的来源。方法/方法:定性研究以深度访谈的形式进行,访谈对象为38名会计师,这些会计师至少有三年在会计事务所的专业经验,或负责编制非金融实体的财务信息。调查结果:受访者的意见表明存在三个维度,构成了识别专业参考群体的基础:1)积极和消极,2)年龄较大(经验较多)和年轻(经验较少)的会计师群体,以及3)在会计服务办公室工作的会计师和在非金融实体的会计部门工作的会计师的不同看法。虽然规范性方面似乎占主导地位,但确定的参考群体既有规范性又有可比性。研究局限性/影响:研究结果的局限性来自所使用的方法(定性研究)和受访者的特征,他们是在波兰工作的会计师。此外,参考群体只在专业参考群体方面被确定,而忽略了更广泛的社会参考群体。原创性/价值:本文首次对会计人员中的参照群体进行了研究,为会计行为研究开辟了一个新的维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信