The implementation of InlineXBRL in Polish listed companies – early evidence

Katarzyna Gierczak, Katarzyna Kobiela-Pionnier
{"title":"The implementation of InlineXBRL in Polish listed companies\n– early evidence","authors":"Katarzyna Gierczak, Katarzyna Kobiela-Pionnier","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.2345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The paper presents early evidence from GPW Main Market-listed companies on the implementation of the InlineXBRL format and the ESEF mandate.\nMethodology/approach: Semi-structured, detailed interviews with GPW issuers are the basic research method used. Representatives of ten listed companies were interviewed. Results: The study indicates that InlineXBRL implementation is a challenge that involves significant human, time and financial resources. Moreover, it reveals that the only reason for XBRL implementation among Polish issuers is compliance with statutory requirements rather than other XBRL benefits. Ninety percent of respondents implemented the bolt-on approach, which enables fast compliance with statutory requirements; however, it does not support internal reporting and does not facilitate the financial reporting process. The study results are consistent with XBRL implementation evidence from American early adopters and confirm the thesis that an XBRL mandate is the main driver of XBRL dissemination.\nLimitations: The relatively small research group (10 companies).\nOriginality/value: This study is the first in this field conducted in Poland, and this paper claims to be the first Polish one to name, structure and describe InlineXBRL implementa-tion options.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53342,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The paper presents early evidence from GPW Main Market-listed companies on the implementation of the InlineXBRL format and the ESEF mandate. Methodology/approach: Semi-structured, detailed interviews with GPW issuers are the basic research method used. Representatives of ten listed companies were interviewed. Results: The study indicates that InlineXBRL implementation is a challenge that involves significant human, time and financial resources. Moreover, it reveals that the only reason for XBRL implementation among Polish issuers is compliance with statutory requirements rather than other XBRL benefits. Ninety percent of respondents implemented the bolt-on approach, which enables fast compliance with statutory requirements; however, it does not support internal reporting and does not facilitate the financial reporting process. The study results are consistent with XBRL implementation evidence from American early adopters and confirm the thesis that an XBRL mandate is the main driver of XBRL dissemination. Limitations: The relatively small research group (10 companies). Originality/value: This study is the first in this field conducted in Poland, and this paper claims to be the first Polish one to name, structure and describe InlineXBRL implementa-tion options.
InlineXBRL在波兰上市公司的实施——早期证据
目的:本文介绍了GPW主要市场上市公司关于InlineXBRL格式实施和ESEF授权的早期证据。方法论/方法:对GPW发行人进行半结构化的详细访谈是使用的基本研究方法。采访了十家上市公司的代表。结果:研究表明,InlineXBRL的实施是一项挑战,涉及大量的人力、时间和财力资源。此外,它揭示了波兰发行人实施XBRL的唯一原因是遵守法定要求,而不是其他XBRL的好处。90%的受访者采用了“补强”方法,可快速符合法定要求;但是,它不支持内部报告,也不促进财务报告过程。研究结果与来自美国早期采用者的XBRL实施证据一致,并证实了XBRL授权是XBRL传播的主要驱动力这一论点。局限性:研究小组相对较小(10家公司)。原创性/价值:本研究是该领域在波兰进行的第一项研究,本文声称是波兰第一篇命名、构建和描述InlineXBRL实施方案的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信