Evaluation of Cytological Scoring and Comparison with Histopathological Finding in a Palpable Breast Lump

Margaret Theresa Joseph, Fathima Jackia Banu, G. Rakesh
{"title":"Evaluation of Cytological Scoring and Comparison with Histopathological Finding in a Palpable Breast Lump","authors":"Margaret Theresa Joseph, Fathima Jackia Banu, G. Rakesh","doi":"10.7860/njlm/2022/52142.2640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Breast cancer is the commonest malignancy worldwide in women. Preoperative evaluation of breast lump plays a major role in the early diagnosis and management of the breast lesions. This study helps in subgrouping the breast lesions into various categories and provides the line of management of each category accordingly. Aim: To evaluate the cytomorphology of various breast lesions, to compare with histopathological findings and to assess the usefulness of Modified Masood’s Scoring Index (MMSI) in palpable breast lumps. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in 61 female patients presented with palpable breast lump between March 2019 and February 2021 at Pathology Department, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India. Cytological examination along with MMSI was applied on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) aspirates, followed by histological confirmation. Under MMSI, the breast lesions were categorised into four groups: Non Proliferative Breast Disease (Non PBD), PBD without atypia, PBD with atypia and carcinoma breast. The data were collected and complied in Microsoft excel programme, appropriate graphs were made and percentages were calculated. Results: Total of 61 cases were analysed, females with age range of 23 to 64 years, mean age of 38 years. Majority of the cases presented with unilateral breast lump (92.5%). In MMSI Scoring, 15/61 (24.5%) were found with the score of 6 followed by 12/61 (19.6%) score of 8 which falls under NPBD. Total of cases 2/61 (3.2%) score of 24 while 3/61 (4.9%) with the score of 23 fell under Carcinoma breast category. Overall concordance observed between MMSI and histopathology was 59/61 cases which is 96.72%, which indicates the high degree of concordance with histopathological diagnosis. Conclusion: MMSI is a simple and reliable scoring system and can be applied on FNAC aspirates. MMSI increase the diagnostic accuracy and provide better concordance with histopathology.","PeriodicalId":31115,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/njlm/2022/52142.2640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the commonest malignancy worldwide in women. Preoperative evaluation of breast lump plays a major role in the early diagnosis and management of the breast lesions. This study helps in subgrouping the breast lesions into various categories and provides the line of management of each category accordingly. Aim: To evaluate the cytomorphology of various breast lesions, to compare with histopathological findings and to assess the usefulness of Modified Masood’s Scoring Index (MMSI) in palpable breast lumps. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in 61 female patients presented with palpable breast lump between March 2019 and February 2021 at Pathology Department, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India. Cytological examination along with MMSI was applied on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) aspirates, followed by histological confirmation. Under MMSI, the breast lesions were categorised into four groups: Non Proliferative Breast Disease (Non PBD), PBD without atypia, PBD with atypia and carcinoma breast. The data were collected and complied in Microsoft excel programme, appropriate graphs were made and percentages were calculated. Results: Total of 61 cases were analysed, females with age range of 23 to 64 years, mean age of 38 years. Majority of the cases presented with unilateral breast lump (92.5%). In MMSI Scoring, 15/61 (24.5%) were found with the score of 6 followed by 12/61 (19.6%) score of 8 which falls under NPBD. Total of cases 2/61 (3.2%) score of 24 while 3/61 (4.9%) with the score of 23 fell under Carcinoma breast category. Overall concordance observed between MMSI and histopathology was 59/61 cases which is 96.72%, which indicates the high degree of concordance with histopathological diagnosis. Conclusion: MMSI is a simple and reliable scoring system and can be applied on FNAC aspirates. MMSI increase the diagnostic accuracy and provide better concordance with histopathology.
可触性乳腺肿块的细胞学评分及与组织病理学比较
乳腺癌是世界范围内女性最常见的恶性肿瘤。乳腺肿块的术前评估对乳腺病变的早期诊断和处理起着重要的作用。这项研究有助于将乳腺病变亚分组为不同的类别,并提供相应的管理路线。目的:评价各种乳腺病变的细胞形态学,与组织病理学结果进行比较,并评价改良马苏德评分指数(MMSI)在可触及乳腺肿块中的应用价值。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,对2019年3月至2021年2月在印度普杜切里Sri Venkateshwaraa医学院医院和研究中心病理科出现可触及乳房肿块的61名女性患者进行了研究。细胞学检查和MMSI应用于细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)抽吸,然后进行组织学确认。MMSI将乳腺病变分为四组:非增殖性乳腺疾病(Non - prolifative breast Disease, Non - PBD)、无异型性的PBD、有异型性的PBD和乳腺癌。数据收集并在Microsoft excel程序中进行整理,绘制相应的图表,计算百分比。结果:共分析61例,女性年龄23 ~ 64岁,平均年龄38岁。大多数病例表现为单侧乳房肿块(92.5%)。MMSI评分中,15/61(24.5%)为6分,12/61(19.6%)为8分,属于NPBD。2/61例(3.2%)评分为24分,3/61例(4.9%)评分为23分。MMSI与组织病理学的总体符合率为59/61例(96.72%),与组织病理学诊断的符合率较高。结论:MMSI是一种简单可靠的评分系统,可用于FNAC吸痰器。MMSI增加了诊断的准确性,并提供了更好的一致性与组织病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信