Mid Upper Arm Circumference as the Best Surrogate Marker for Identification of Low Birth Weight in Newborns within the First 24 Hours of Life- A Cross-sectional Study

Jayashri Chandrakant Sawale, L. Dhande, Pooja Bhimashankar Nagrale
{"title":"Mid Upper Arm Circumference as the Best Surrogate Marker for Identification of Low Birth Weight in Newborns within the First 24 Hours of Life- A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Jayashri Chandrakant Sawale, L. Dhande, Pooja Bhimashankar Nagrale","doi":"10.7860/ijnmr/2023/58624.2378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Birth weight is a very important determinant factor regarding perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, in developing countries like India weighing facility may not be available in rural areas where an alternative anthropometric parameter like Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) may be considered alternative to birth weight. Aim: To determine the accuracy of MUAC by comparing it with different anthropometric parameters for identification of LBW in neonates within the first 24 hours of life. Materials and Methods: The present study was a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted in labour ward, Postnatal Care (PNC) wards and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur. Total 640 babies were enrolled over a period of 2 years from September 2018 to September 2020. Anthropometric parameters like weight, length, head circumference, Chest Circumference (CC), MUAC, ponderal index were taken by a researcher using standard techniques within first 24 hours of life and correlated with birth weight by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The comparison of the quantitative and qualitative variables was analysed using independent t-test and chi-square test, respectively. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find out cut- off point of anthropometric parameters for predicting birth weight (<2000 gm, <1500 gm, <1000 gm). DeLong test was used for comparison of area under curve between different anthropometric parameters for predicting birth weight (<2000 gm, <1500 gm, <1000 gm). Univariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of anthropometric parameters on birth weight. The data entry was done in the Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheet and final analysis was done with the use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Results: Among 640 newborns, 334 (59.19%) were females and 306 (47.81%) were males. The mean birth weight was 1903.93 grams and MUAC of 8.3cm. All the chosen parameters showed significant correlation with birth weight (p<0.001). However, MUAC showed strongest correlation (r=0.890) with birth weight and easy to measure. Cut-offs of MUAC ≤8.45 cm, ≤7.5 cm, ≤6.8 cm predict birth weight of <2000gm, <1500gm, <1000gm with sensitivity of 91.22%, 92.81%, 100% and specificity of 88.95%, 89.12%, 89.35%, respectively. Conclusion: MUAC is the most simple and best surrogate measure that can be used in domiciliary outreach when it is impossible to record weight of baby at birth.","PeriodicalId":31116,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2023/58624.2378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Birth weight is a very important determinant factor regarding perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, in developing countries like India weighing facility may not be available in rural areas where an alternative anthropometric parameter like Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) may be considered alternative to birth weight. Aim: To determine the accuracy of MUAC by comparing it with different anthropometric parameters for identification of LBW in neonates within the first 24 hours of life. Materials and Methods: The present study was a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted in labour ward, Postnatal Care (PNC) wards and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur. Total 640 babies were enrolled over a period of 2 years from September 2018 to September 2020. Anthropometric parameters like weight, length, head circumference, Chest Circumference (CC), MUAC, ponderal index were taken by a researcher using standard techniques within first 24 hours of life and correlated with birth weight by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The comparison of the quantitative and qualitative variables was analysed using independent t-test and chi-square test, respectively. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find out cut- off point of anthropometric parameters for predicting birth weight (<2000 gm, <1500 gm, <1000 gm). DeLong test was used for comparison of area under curve between different anthropometric parameters for predicting birth weight (<2000 gm, <1500 gm, <1000 gm). Univariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of anthropometric parameters on birth weight. The data entry was done in the Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheet and final analysis was done with the use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Results: Among 640 newborns, 334 (59.19%) were females and 306 (47.81%) were males. The mean birth weight was 1903.93 grams and MUAC of 8.3cm. All the chosen parameters showed significant correlation with birth weight (p<0.001). However, MUAC showed strongest correlation (r=0.890) with birth weight and easy to measure. Cut-offs of MUAC ≤8.45 cm, ≤7.5 cm, ≤6.8 cm predict birth weight of <2000gm, <1500gm, <1000gm with sensitivity of 91.22%, 92.81%, 100% and specificity of 88.95%, 89.12%, 89.35%, respectively. Conclusion: MUAC is the most simple and best surrogate measure that can be used in domiciliary outreach when it is impossible to record weight of baby at birth.
中上臂围作为鉴别出生后24小时内新生儿低出生体重的最佳替代指标——一项横断面研究
出生体重是围产期发病率和死亡率的一个非常重要的决定因素。然而,在像印度这样的发展中国家,在农村地区可能没有称重设备,在这些地区,像中上臂围(MUAC)这样的替代人体测量参数可能被认为是出生体重的替代。目的:通过将MUAC与不同的人体测量参数进行比较,确定其在新生儿出生后24小时内诊断LBW的准确性。材料和方法:本研究是一项基于医院的横断面研究,在那格浦尔英迪拉甘地医学院的分娩病房、产后护理病房和新生儿重症监护病房进行。在2018年9月至2020年9月的两年时间里,共有640名婴儿入组。人体测量参数,如体重,长度,头围,胸围(CC), MUAC, ponderal指数由研究人员使用标准技术在生命的最初24小时内测量,并使用Pearson相关系数将其与出生体重相关联。定量变量和定性变量的比较分别采用独立t检验和卡方检验。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线寻找预测出生体重(<2000 gm、<1500 gm、<1000 gm)的人体测量参数的截断点。采用DeLong检验比较不同人体测量参数预测出生体重(<2000 gm、<1500 gm、<1000 gm)的曲线下面积。采用单变量线性回归评估人体测量参数对出生体重的影响。数据录入采用Microsoft EXCEL电子表格,最终分析采用SPSS 21.0版软件。结果:640例新生儿中,女婴334例(59.19%),男婴306例(47.81%)。平均出生体重1903.93 g, MUAC 8.3cm。所选参数均与出生体重有显著相关性(p<0.001)。然而,MUAC与出生体重相关性最强(r=0.890),且易于测量。MUAC截断值≤8.45 cm、≤7.5 cm、≤6.8 cm预测出生体重<2000gm、<1500gm、<1000gm的敏感性分别为91.22%、92.81%、100%,特异性分别为88.95%、89.12%、89.35%。结论:在无法记录新生儿出生体重的情况下,MUAC是最简单、最好的替代测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信