Learning styles and academic performance in Distance Education: a research in specialization courses

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Denise Mendes da Silva, Edvalda Araújo Leal, J. M. Pereira, J. D. O. Neto
{"title":"Learning styles and academic performance in Distance Education: a research in specialization courses","authors":"Denise Mendes da Silva, Edvalda Araújo Leal, J. M. Pereira, J. D. O. Neto","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V17I57.1852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective – The objective of the study is to identify whether learning styles impact academic performance and online and face-to-face assessment activities in Distance Education. Design/methodology/approach – Learning styles were mapped using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) of Felder and Soloman (1991). For data analysis, generalized linear models methodology was adopted; the Wald test was used to evaluate the effect of the factors. Theoretical foundation - This research is based on cognitive theory. The model of Felder and Silverman (1988) underlies the ILS of Felder and Soloman (1991), which classifies learning styles into four dimensions: Active / Reflective; Sensory / Intuitive; Visual / Verbal; Sequential / Global. Findings – (i) The predominant profile of the sample consists of the following styles: active, sensory, verbal and sequential; (ii) learning styles impacted academic performance only in the Active / Reflective dimension; (iii) significant differences were found between the mean of online and face-to-face assessment activities only in the Sensory / Intuitive dimension; (iv) the means of online assessment activities are larger in every styles dimensions. Practical implications – Contributions for: (i) professors, as to how to choose and shape teaching strategies, i.e, to adopt teaching techniques that are appropriate to students’ characteristics; (ii) for students, knowing their learning style is important to understand and develop new learning strategies; (iii) educational managers, who can use knowledge about learning styles to structure the LMS with better use of resources and promoting student learning.","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V17I57.1852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective – The objective of the study is to identify whether learning styles impact academic performance and online and face-to-face assessment activities in Distance Education. Design/methodology/approach – Learning styles were mapped using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) of Felder and Soloman (1991). For data analysis, generalized linear models methodology was adopted; the Wald test was used to evaluate the effect of the factors. Theoretical foundation - This research is based on cognitive theory. The model of Felder and Silverman (1988) underlies the ILS of Felder and Soloman (1991), which classifies learning styles into four dimensions: Active / Reflective; Sensory / Intuitive; Visual / Verbal; Sequential / Global. Findings – (i) The predominant profile of the sample consists of the following styles: active, sensory, verbal and sequential; (ii) learning styles impacted academic performance only in the Active / Reflective dimension; (iii) significant differences were found between the mean of online and face-to-face assessment activities only in the Sensory / Intuitive dimension; (iv) the means of online assessment activities are larger in every styles dimensions. Practical implications – Contributions for: (i) professors, as to how to choose and shape teaching strategies, i.e, to adopt teaching techniques that are appropriate to students’ characteristics; (ii) for students, knowing their learning style is important to understand and develop new learning strategies; (iii) educational managers, who can use knowledge about learning styles to structure the LMS with better use of resources and promoting student learning.
远程教育学习方式与学习成绩:专业课程研究
目的-本研究的目的是确定学习方式是否影响远程教育中的学习成绩以及在线和面对面的评估活动。设计/方法论/方法——学习风格是使用Felder和Soloman(1991)的学习风格指数(ILS)绘制的。数据分析采用广义线性模型方法;采用Wald检验评价各因素的影响。理论基础-本研究基于认知理论。费尔德和西尔弗曼(1988)的模型是费尔德和所罗门(1991)学习风格理论的基础,后者将学习风格分为四个维度:主动/反思;感官/直觉;视觉/语言;顺序/全局。调查结果- (i)样本的主要特征包括以下风格:主动、感官、口头和顺序;(ii)学习风格仅在主动/反思维度上影响学习成绩;(iii)仅在感官/直觉维度上,在线和面对面评估活动的平均值之间存在显著差异;(iv)在线评估活动的手段在每个风格维度上都更大。实际意义-对以下方面的贡献:(i)教授如何选择和塑造教学策略,即采用适合学生特点的教学技巧;(ii)对学生而言,了解自己的学习风格对了解和发展新的学习策略很重要;(iii)教育管理者,他们可以利用学习风格的知识来构建LMS,更好地利用资源,促进学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信