Faculty Development for the Use of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation: A Systematic Review

W. Nehring, Teressa M Wexler, F. Hughes, Audry Greenwell
{"title":"Faculty Development for the Use of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation: A Systematic Review","authors":"W. Nehring, Teressa M Wexler, F. Hughes, Audry Greenwell","doi":"10.59942/2325-9981.1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a systematic review of the research data between 1995 and June 2013 concerning faculty development in the use of high-fidelity patient simulation for health professionals and students with a search of the following databases: CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health Collection: Comprehensive, OVID Medline, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertation/Theses Database. The primary search terms were high-fidelity patient simulation and faculty development. Reference lists from relevant articles were also reviewed. Twenty-five studies were included for this review. The majority of the studies were surveys with a few quasiexperimental designs. The themes were similar to those found in the non-research literature: strengths, incentives, barriers, use of faculty champions/simulation coordinator, and faculty development. The validity and reliability differed by study. There are numerous incentives and barriers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation by faculty. Several examples of faculty development programs have been described in the literature but little evaluation has taken place beyond the end of the program. The goal of the use of high-fidelity patient simulation is to enhance the student’s knowledge, skills, and critical thinking in the care of patients. It is essential that the faculty are competent to provide instruction with high-fidelity patient simulation and therefore, the efficacy of these developmental programs need closer attention.","PeriodicalId":91286,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health sciences education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health sciences education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59942/2325-9981.1004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This is a systematic review of the research data between 1995 and June 2013 concerning faculty development in the use of high-fidelity patient simulation for health professionals and students with a search of the following databases: CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health Collection: Comprehensive, OVID Medline, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertation/Theses Database. The primary search terms were high-fidelity patient simulation and faculty development. Reference lists from relevant articles were also reviewed. Twenty-five studies were included for this review. The majority of the studies were surveys with a few quasiexperimental designs. The themes were similar to those found in the non-research literature: strengths, incentives, barriers, use of faculty champions/simulation coordinator, and faculty development. The validity and reliability differed by study. There are numerous incentives and barriers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation by faculty. Several examples of faculty development programs have been described in the literature but little evaluation has taken place beyond the end of the program. The goal of the use of high-fidelity patient simulation is to enhance the student’s knowledge, skills, and critical thinking in the care of patients. It is essential that the faculty are competent to provide instruction with high-fidelity patient simulation and therefore, the efficacy of these developmental programs need closer attention.
教师发展使用高保真病人模拟:系统回顾
本文系统回顾了1995年至2013年6月期间的研究数据,涉及教师在医疗专业人员和学生使用高保真患者模拟方面的发展,并搜索了以下数据库:CINAHL,护理和联合健康收集:综合,OVID Medline, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus和ProQuest论文/论文数据库。主要搜索词是高保真病人模拟和教员发展。并对相关文章的参考文献进行了回顾。本综述纳入了25项研究。大多数研究都是带有一些准实验设计的调查。这些主题与非研究文献中的主题相似:优势、激励、障碍、教员冠军/模拟协调员的使用以及教员发展。不同研究的效度和信度存在差异。教师使用高保真病人模拟有许多激励和障碍。文献中描述了几个教师发展项目的例子,但在项目结束后很少进行评估。使用高保真病人模拟的目标是提高学生的知识,技能和批判性思维在照顾病人。至关重要的是,教师有能力提供高保真病人模拟的指导,因此,这些发展项目的有效性需要密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信