Komparativni i društveno-kritički pristup romanima Pupak sveta Venka Andonovskog i Dobri dani Marka Dinića u germanističkoj nastavi

Marina Petrović-Jilih
{"title":"Komparativni i društveno-kritički pristup romanima Pupak sveta Venka Andonovskog i Dobri dani Marka Dinića u germanističkoj nastavi","authors":"Marina Petrović-Jilih","doi":"10.5937/inovacije2302092p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the current scientific and literary-didactic discourse, this paper has as its subject the analysis of the group discussion and the categorization of the so-called functional literary competences which students of German language studies should master. The focus of dealing with literary texts in the eighth semester of the German language studies is, apart from their literary nature, primarily their socio-political impulses and influence on the transfer from the world of the text to the world around us. By comparing the two novels, The Navel of the World by Venko Andonovski and Dobri dani by Marko Dinić, and by means of their productive treatment in the classroom, we will see whether literary texts contribute to the development of the social-critical engagement of the recipients. Along with observing and defining the didactics of literature as an applied science and a part of the literary social system, qualitative scientific methodology was applied in this research. After the semi-structured group discussion procedure, the obtained data were analyzed and categorized. The research questions supported by theoretical postulates important for this paper arose from teaching practice, while methodological examples and research results bring it back to that practice.","PeriodicalId":32413,"journal":{"name":"Inovacije u Nastavi","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inovacije u Nastavi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2302092p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on the current scientific and literary-didactic discourse, this paper has as its subject the analysis of the group discussion and the categorization of the so-called functional literary competences which students of German language studies should master. The focus of dealing with literary texts in the eighth semester of the German language studies is, apart from their literary nature, primarily their socio-political impulses and influence on the transfer from the world of the text to the world around us. By comparing the two novels, The Navel of the World by Venko Andonovski and Dobri dani by Marko Dinić, and by means of their productive treatment in the classroom, we will see whether literary texts contribute to the development of the social-critical engagement of the recipients. Along with observing and defining the didactics of literature as an applied science and a part of the literary social system, qualitative scientific methodology was applied in this research. After the semi-structured group discussion procedure, the obtained data were analyzed and categorized. The research questions supported by theoretical postulates important for this paper arose from teaching practice, while methodological examples and research results bring it back to that practice.
文卡·安多诺夫斯基小说《Pupak World》与德国续作《Good Day Mark Dinic》的比较与社会批判
本文以当前科学的文学教学话语为基础,对德语学生应掌握的所谓功能性文学能力进行分组讨论和分类分析。在德语学习的第八学期中,处理文学文本的重点是,除了它们的文学性质外,主要是它们的社会政治冲动和对从文本世界转移到我们周围世界的影响。通过比较文科·安多诺夫斯基的《世界的肚脐》和马尔科·迪尼奇的《多布里·达尼》这两部小说,并通过它们在课堂上的生产性处理,我们将看到文学文本是否有助于接受者社会批判参与的发展。在对文学教学作为一门应用科学和文学社会系统的一部分进行观察和界定的同时,本研究运用了定性的科学方法论。经过半结构化的小组讨论程序,对获得的数据进行分析和分类。本文重要的理论假设所支持的研究问题来源于教学实践,而方法论实例和研究成果则将本文带回教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信