Interakcije između različitih vrsta matematičkog znanja u udžbenicima matematike za zapreminu tela

Olivera J. Đokić, Predrag Popović
{"title":"Interakcije između različitih vrsta matematičkog znanja u udžbenicima matematike za zapreminu tela","authors":"Olivera J. Đokić, Predrag Popović","doi":"10.5937/inovacije2302072d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the international TIMSS research (2011, 2015, 2019) for Serbia for pupils of the fourth grade of primary school show that their achievement in the field of geometry and measurement is lower than in other areas (such as number). In order to examine the possible causes, we analysed the textbooks for the fourth grade of primary school that were used in schools in Serbia in the year of the research. The aim of the research is to examine two types of knowledge - conceptual and procedural - in mathematics textbooks on the topic of body volume. Based on the research of pupils' achievement in different types of knowledge in measuring length, area, and volume (Tan Şişman, 2010), we formed a list of indicators that indicate opportunities for learning in mathematics textbooks and different types of knowledge about body volume that are presented to the fourth-grade primary school pupils. In the paper, a descriptive method was applied to analyse the content of the textbooks and the interactions among different types of knowledge in mathematical tasks. The main results of the research show that the indicators that are oriented towards the recognition of the conceptual understanding show a significantly lower frequency of occurrence compared to the indicators of procedural knowledge. We see the reason for this in the initial formation of the concept of body volume. The conclusions of the paper point to the concern regarding the interaction among different types of knowledge, and open up questions for further research, especially from the perspective of the research and development of mathematics textbooks in mathematics education.","PeriodicalId":32413,"journal":{"name":"Inovacije u Nastavi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inovacije u Nastavi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2302072d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of the international TIMSS research (2011, 2015, 2019) for Serbia for pupils of the fourth grade of primary school show that their achievement in the field of geometry and measurement is lower than in other areas (such as number). In order to examine the possible causes, we analysed the textbooks for the fourth grade of primary school that were used in schools in Serbia in the year of the research. The aim of the research is to examine two types of knowledge - conceptual and procedural - in mathematics textbooks on the topic of body volume. Based on the research of pupils' achievement in different types of knowledge in measuring length, area, and volume (Tan Şişman, 2010), we formed a list of indicators that indicate opportunities for learning in mathematics textbooks and different types of knowledge about body volume that are presented to the fourth-grade primary school pupils. In the paper, a descriptive method was applied to analyse the content of the textbooks and the interactions among different types of knowledge in mathematical tasks. The main results of the research show that the indicators that are oriented towards the recognition of the conceptual understanding show a significantly lower frequency of occurrence compared to the indicators of procedural knowledge. We see the reason for this in the initial formation of the concept of body volume. The conclusions of the paper point to the concern regarding the interaction among different types of knowledge, and open up questions for further research, especially from the perspective of the research and development of mathematics textbooks in mathematics education.
身体数学教材中不同数学知识的互动
国际TIMSS研究(2011年、2015年、2019年)对塞尔维亚小学四年级学生的结果表明,他们在几何和测量领域的成就低于其他领域(如数字)。为了检查可能的原因,我们分析了研究当年塞尔维亚学校使用的小学四年级教科书。本研究的目的是检验数学教科书中关于人体体积的两种类型的知识-概念性和程序性。通过对小学生在测量长度、面积和体积的不同类型知识方面的成绩的研究(Tan Şişman, 2010),我们形成了一份指标清单,该指标反映了小学四年级学生在数学教科书中学习的机会和不同类型的关于身体体积的知识。本文采用描述性的方法分析了教材的内容以及数学任务中不同类型知识之间的相互作用。研究的主要结果表明,与程序性知识指标相比,面向概念性理解的指标的出现频率明显较低。我们在人体体积概念的最初形成中看到了这一点的原因。本文的结论指出了对不同类型知识之间相互作用的关注,并提出了进一步研究的问题,特别是从数学教育中数学教科书的研究与开发的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信