Human dignity and bioethics

M. Marjanović
{"title":"Human dignity and bioethics","authors":"M. Marjanović","doi":"10.5937/zrpfns47-5217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By opening the field of bioethics followed a new wave of intense debate on the theological, philosophical and legal significance of the concept of human dignity . Exactly ten years ago (December 2003) American bioethicist Ruth Maclin has proposed to divest ourselves of the concept of human dignity because it is vague, useless and redundant and that, without any loss, we can replace it by the ethical principle of personal autonomy. Her article was followed by harsh reactions and opposite views. What is this term in so broad, almost inflationary and opposite use is not a reason to deprive him, but, on the contrary, it shows how important it is and that it should be determined at least outline. As universal values and general concept, the human dignity has no pre-defined and narrow, precise meaning. It is more an evaluation horizon, the guiding principle and regulatory ideas that must constantly define and codify by many guaranted human rights and fundamental freedoms. As generic notion of each reasonable law, it is their foundation and a common denominator, legitimising basis of natural but also of positive law. As intrinsic and static value which means the humaneness, the humanity it is absolute, inherent to every human being without distinction and conditioning, as a unique and unrepeatable creation. In this meaning, the dignity is the obligation and limitation of the state, society and each of us. As an ethical and dynamic category, it is not given to us, but it is assign to us, and it is not in us, but always before us, as a guide of our actions in accordance with virtues, to treat ourselves, each other and the nature in a human way. The century in which we live is named the century of molecular biology and genetic engineering because of the enormous potential but also risks to human dignity. Because of that human dignity has become a central principle in all international documents relating to the human genome, genetics and bioethics, adopted by UNESCO and the Council of Europe, at the turn of the century, as well as in other documents that refer to them. Human dignity is the paradigm of our time. For more than half a century, it structures the rule of law, it is a constituent of a modern democratic society, announces a new, partnership with nature and creates a new image of every man as a hero of our time.","PeriodicalId":31571,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","volume":"47 1","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5937/zrpfns47-5217","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns47-5217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By opening the field of bioethics followed a new wave of intense debate on the theological, philosophical and legal significance of the concept of human dignity . Exactly ten years ago (December 2003) American bioethicist Ruth Maclin has proposed to divest ourselves of the concept of human dignity because it is vague, useless and redundant and that, without any loss, we can replace it by the ethical principle of personal autonomy. Her article was followed by harsh reactions and opposite views. What is this term in so broad, almost inflationary and opposite use is not a reason to deprive him, but, on the contrary, it shows how important it is and that it should be determined at least outline. As universal values and general concept, the human dignity has no pre-defined and narrow, precise meaning. It is more an evaluation horizon, the guiding principle and regulatory ideas that must constantly define and codify by many guaranted human rights and fundamental freedoms. As generic notion of each reasonable law, it is their foundation and a common denominator, legitimising basis of natural but also of positive law. As intrinsic and static value which means the humaneness, the humanity it is absolute, inherent to every human being without distinction and conditioning, as a unique and unrepeatable creation. In this meaning, the dignity is the obligation and limitation of the state, society and each of us. As an ethical and dynamic category, it is not given to us, but it is assign to us, and it is not in us, but always before us, as a guide of our actions in accordance with virtues, to treat ourselves, each other and the nature in a human way. The century in which we live is named the century of molecular biology and genetic engineering because of the enormous potential but also risks to human dignity. Because of that human dignity has become a central principle in all international documents relating to the human genome, genetics and bioethics, adopted by UNESCO and the Council of Europe, at the turn of the century, as well as in other documents that refer to them. Human dignity is the paradigm of our time. For more than half a century, it structures the rule of law, it is a constituent of a modern democratic society, announces a new, partnership with nature and creates a new image of every man as a hero of our time.
人的尊严和生命伦理
生物伦理学领域的开辟引起了关于人类尊严概念的神学、哲学和法律意义的新一轮激烈辩论。就在十年前(2003年12月),美国生物伦理学家露丝·麦克林(Ruth Maclin)建议我们放弃人类尊严的概念,因为它是模糊的、无用的、多余的,我们可以用个人自主的伦理原则来取代它,而不会有任何损失。她的文章引起了激烈的反应和相反的观点。这个术语如此广泛,几乎是膨胀和相反的用法,这并不是剥夺他的理由,相反,它表明它是多么重要,至少应该确定它的轮廓。人的尊严作为一种普世价值和普遍概念,没有预设的、狭隘的、精确的含义。它更多的是一种评价范围,一种指导原则和管理思想,必须由许多得到保障的人权和基本自由不断界定和编纂。作为每一种合理法律的一般概念,它是它们的基础和公分母,是自然法和成文法合法化的基础。作为一种内在的、静态的价值,它意味着人性,人性是绝对的,是每个人固有的,没有区别和条件,是一种独特的、不可复制的创造。在这个意义上,尊严是国家、社会和我们每个人的义务和限制。作为一种伦理的、动态的范畴,它不是赋予我们的,而是赋予我们的,它不在我们心中,而是始终在我们面前,作为我们按照美德行动的指南,以人性的方式对待自己、对待他人和自然。我们生活的这个世纪被称为分子生物学和基因工程的世纪,因为它有巨大的潜力,但也有威胁到人类尊严的风险。因此,人的尊严已成为教科文组织和欧洲理事会在世纪之交通过的有关人类基因组、遗传学和生物伦理学的所有国际文件以及提及这些文件的其他文件的中心原则。人的尊严是我们这个时代的典范。半个多世纪以来,它构成了法治,它是现代民主社会的一个组成部分,它宣布了与自然的一种新的伙伴关系,并创造了每个人作为我们时代英雄的新形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信