Human dignity as a social and legal value

Marjanović Miloš
{"title":"Human dignity as a social and legal value","authors":"Marjanović Miloš","doi":"10.5937/ZRPFNS47-4945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author review almost inflationary and vague use of the concept human dignity. It is more regulatory principle, than general notion with standardized meaning. Its philosophical, theological, legal and bioethical dimensions are emphasized. The principle of human dignity is constitutive not only for the moral but also for modern society, the foundation of both natural and positive law, as well as the center of the bioethical debate. Versus its earlier aristocratic use, in this article are analyzed his philosophical meanings as humanity , especially the human, reasonable, free self-determination of man ( Cicero, Aquinas , Mirandola, Kant ) and democratic foundational meanings in many international documents and constitutions of some countries in which are occasionally in their very beginning. There are investigated its internal and outer dimensions (natural and social conditions). Legal guarantees for the human rights are essential for the realization of human dignity, but the constraint inherent to the law may jeopardize it as a legal value. The right to a sentence can be seen as a restoration of human dignity. There are a natural dignity, equal for all people, and social dignity, in which are still visible differences and inequalities. In the ecological and bioethical debates, appear critiques of the concept of human dignity as an anthropocentric value. Some authors began to speak about the dignity of all Created, the dignity of nature and law of nature. As a new paradigm, the dignity structures to qualitative different way our view of the world - state and law, all society, but also of man and nature.","PeriodicalId":31571,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","volume":"47 1","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5937/ZRPFNS47-4945","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRPFNS47-4945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author review almost inflationary and vague use of the concept human dignity. It is more regulatory principle, than general notion with standardized meaning. Its philosophical, theological, legal and bioethical dimensions are emphasized. The principle of human dignity is constitutive not only for the moral but also for modern society, the foundation of both natural and positive law, as well as the center of the bioethical debate. Versus its earlier aristocratic use, in this article are analyzed his philosophical meanings as humanity , especially the human, reasonable, free self-determination of man ( Cicero, Aquinas , Mirandola, Kant ) and democratic foundational meanings in many international documents and constitutions of some countries in which are occasionally in their very beginning. There are investigated its internal and outer dimensions (natural and social conditions). Legal guarantees for the human rights are essential for the realization of human dignity, but the constraint inherent to the law may jeopardize it as a legal value. The right to a sentence can be seen as a restoration of human dignity. There are a natural dignity, equal for all people, and social dignity, in which are still visible differences and inequalities. In the ecological and bioethical debates, appear critiques of the concept of human dignity as an anthropocentric value. Some authors began to speak about the dignity of all Created, the dignity of nature and law of nature. As a new paradigm, the dignity structures to qualitative different way our view of the world - state and law, all society, but also of man and nature.
人的尊严作为一种社会和法律价值
作者回顾了人类尊严这一概念近乎膨胀和模糊的用法。它是一种规范性原则,而不是具有标准化意义的一般概念。强调其哲学、神学、法律和生物伦理方面。人的尊严原则不仅是道德社会的基本原则,也是现代社会的基本原则,是自然法和实在法的基础,也是生命伦理争论的中心。相对于其早期的贵族使用,本文分析了他作为人性的哲学意义,特别是人的人性的、合理的、自由的自决(西塞罗、阿奎那、米兰多拉、康德)和民主的基础意义在许多国际文件和一些国家的宪法中偶尔处于起步阶段。对其内部和外部方面(自然和社会条件)进行了调查。对人权的法律保障对于实现人的尊严至关重要,但法律固有的约束可能危及人权作为一种法律价值。被判刑的权利可以被看作是人类尊严的恢复。一种是人人平等的自然尊严,另一种是仍然存在明显差异和不平等的社会尊严。在生态和生物伦理的辩论中,出现了对人类尊严概念作为人类中心价值的批评。一些作家开始谈论万物的尊严,自然的尊严和自然法则。作为一种新的范式,尊严以质的不同方式建构了我们的世界观——国家与法律,所有社会,以及人与自然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书