Abolition of exequatur for judgments requiring the return of a child in practice: The Povse case

Bernadet Bordaš
{"title":"Abolition of exequatur for judgments requiring the return of a child in practice: The Povse case","authors":"Bernadet Bordaš","doi":"10.5937/ZRPFNS48-7264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brussels II bis Regulation is the first source of law of EU private international law that introduces abolition of exequatur for specific judgments given pursuant to Article 11(8) which require the return of the child. The goal of the abolition of exequatur is to achieve a rapid return of the child to his country of habitual residence immediately prior to her/his wrongful removal. This goal has to be reached, inter alia, by reducing the jurisdiction of the State of enforcement of certified judgments to questions of enforcement stricto sensu under the national procedural law of that State. On the other hand, the State of origin of the judgments shall be responsible for all matters relating to the merits of the judgments and to the certification of these judgments, this latter substituting the procedure of exequatur in the Member State of enforcement. The Povse case shows that complex facts of a case, proceedings before the respective national courts, the time needed for the interpretation of union law by the Court of EU, and the international law on the protection of human rights questions the goal of abolition of exequatur under this Regulation.","PeriodicalId":31571,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","volume":"17 1","pages":"107-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5937/ZRPFNS48-7264","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRPFNS48-7264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brussels II bis Regulation is the first source of law of EU private international law that introduces abolition of exequatur for specific judgments given pursuant to Article 11(8) which require the return of the child. The goal of the abolition of exequatur is to achieve a rapid return of the child to his country of habitual residence immediately prior to her/his wrongful removal. This goal has to be reached, inter alia, by reducing the jurisdiction of the State of enforcement of certified judgments to questions of enforcement stricto sensu under the national procedural law of that State. On the other hand, the State of origin of the judgments shall be responsible for all matters relating to the merits of the judgments and to the certification of these judgments, this latter substituting the procedure of exequatur in the Member State of enforcement. The Povse case shows that complex facts of a case, proceedings before the respective national courts, the time needed for the interpretation of union law by the Court of EU, and the international law on the protection of human rights questions the goal of abolition of exequatur under this Regulation.
在实践中废除要求归还儿童的判决:波夫斯案
《布鲁塞尔II条例》是欧盟国际私法的第一个法律渊源,它引入了废除根据第11(8)条作出的要求归还儿童的具体判决的时效。废除驱逐出境的目标是使儿童在被非法驱逐之前迅速返回其惯常居住国。要达到这一目标,除其他外,必须将已证明的判决的执行国的管辖权缩小为根据该国国家程序法严格意义上的执行问题。另一方面,判决的原籍国应负责与判决的是非曲性和这些判决的核证有关的一切事项,核证将取代执行会员国的判决程序。Povse案表明,案件的复杂事实、各自国家法院的诉讼程序、欧盟法院解释联盟法所需的时间以及保护人权的国际法,都对根据本条例废除死刑的目标提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信