The precautionary principle in international environmental law and international jurisprudence

Bojan N. Tubić
{"title":"The precautionary principle in international environmental law and international jurisprudence","authors":"Bojan N. Tubić","doi":"10.5937/ZRPFNS48-6745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analysis international regulation of the precautionary principle as one of environmental principles. This principle envisages that when there are threats of serious and irreparable harm, as a consequence of certain economic activity, the lack of scientific evidence and full certainty cannot be used as a reason for postponing efficient measures for preventing environmental harm. From economic point of view, the application of precautionary principle is problematic, because it creates larger responsibility for those who create possible risks, comparing to the previous period. The precautionary principle can be found in numerous international treaties in this field, which regulate it in a very similar manner. There is no consensus in doctrine whether this principle has reached the level of international customary law, because it was interpreted differently and it was not accepted by large number of countries in their national legislations. It represents a developing concept which is consisted of changing positions on adequate roles of science, economy, politics and law in the field of environmental protection. This principle has been discussed in several cases before International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.","PeriodicalId":31571,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","volume":"48 1","pages":"367-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5937/ZRPFNS48-6745","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRPFNS48-6745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper analysis international regulation of the precautionary principle as one of environmental principles. This principle envisages that when there are threats of serious and irreparable harm, as a consequence of certain economic activity, the lack of scientific evidence and full certainty cannot be used as a reason for postponing efficient measures for preventing environmental harm. From economic point of view, the application of precautionary principle is problematic, because it creates larger responsibility for those who create possible risks, comparing to the previous period. The precautionary principle can be found in numerous international treaties in this field, which regulate it in a very similar manner. There is no consensus in doctrine whether this principle has reached the level of international customary law, because it was interpreted differently and it was not accepted by large number of countries in their national legislations. It represents a developing concept which is consisted of changing positions on adequate roles of science, economy, politics and law in the field of environmental protection. This principle has been discussed in several cases before International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
国际环境法与国际法理学中的预防原则
本文分析了作为环境原则之一的预防原则的国际规则。这一原则设想,当某些经济活动可能造成严重和无法弥补的损害时,不能以缺乏科学证据和完全确定作为推迟采取有效措施防止环境损害的理由。从经济学的角度来看,预防原则的应用是有问题的,因为与前一时期相比,它给那些制造可能风险的人带来了更大的责任。预防原则可以在这一领域的许多国际条约中找到,这些条约以非常类似的方式对预防原则进行管理。这一原则是否已达到国际习惯法的水平,在理论上没有达成共识,因为对它的解释不同,许多国家在其国内立法中没有接受它。它代表了一种发展的理念,它是由科学、经济、政治和法律在环境保护领域中充分发挥作用的立场变化组成的。这一原则已在国际法院和国际海洋法法庭审理的若干案件中得到讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书