On the Compatibility of Competing Narratives

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Balkan Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5840/BJP20211312

D. Weberman

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reconstruct past events, whether in history or in everyday life, in the form of narratives. Yet narratives describing one and the same set of events can and do differ. What is the relation between these different narratives? Must they necessarily conflict? When are they compatible and when not? If we can tell stories differently without getting the facts wrong, what constraints can there be for judging the adequacy of competing narratives?

查看原文本刊更多论文

论竞争叙事的兼容性

我们以叙事的形式重构过去的事件，无论是在历史上还是在日常生活中。然而，描述同一组事件的叙述可以而且确实不同。这些不同叙述之间的关系是什么?它们一定会冲突吗?它们什么时候兼容，什么时候不兼容?如果我们可以用不同的方式讲述故事，而不会弄错事实，那么判断竞争叙事的充分性又有什么限制呢?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Balkan Journal of Philosophy PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Balkan Journal of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed international periodical, academic in spirit, that publishes high-quality papers on current problems and discussions in philosophy. While open to all fields and interests, the journal devotes special attention to the treatment of philosophical problems in the Balkans and south-eastern Europe, and to their influence on the development of philosophy in this region. All papers are publisihed in English. BJP is published under the auspices of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.