Seismic control for elevated roads

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
U. Dorka
{"title":"Seismic control for elevated roads","authors":"U. Dorka","doi":"10.5937/grmk1404009D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past earthquakes have demonstrated the vulnerability of deck bridges, which are the most common type in elevated roads. Especially over-loading of piers and drop-off of sections are a continuing concern. Seismic Control concepts, when correctly understood and applied, can provide the necessary physical force limits and reduced displacements even under loading beyond the design limit. The concept of choice here is the Hysteretic Device System since deck bridges usually provide a natural seismic link between piers and deck. To study the performance and robustness of this concept, shaking table tests were performed at IZIIS, Skopje during the NATO-SfP project ISUbridge on a model deck bridge using controllable friction devices UHYDE-fbr to simulate the behavior of different passive devices including device failure. The tests showed that a stiff-ductile device in the link not only protects the piers from over-load, but also provides superior performance compared to viscous or soft base-isolation devices. Failure of such a device further reduced the demand on the piers but did not lead to excessive deck displacements or damage, thus confirming considerable seismic robustness for the HDS concept. This corroborates observations on the Bolu viaduct during the Kocaeli event. Unfortunately, HDS is often confused with Base- Isolation, which leads to the application of BI-devices, like LRBs and thus a reduction in performance and robustness. This is even more true for viscous devices, which are favored today.","PeriodicalId":40707,"journal":{"name":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","volume":"57 1","pages":"9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/grmk1404009D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Past earthquakes have demonstrated the vulnerability of deck bridges, which are the most common type in elevated roads. Especially over-loading of piers and drop-off of sections are a continuing concern. Seismic Control concepts, when correctly understood and applied, can provide the necessary physical force limits and reduced displacements even under loading beyond the design limit. The concept of choice here is the Hysteretic Device System since deck bridges usually provide a natural seismic link between piers and deck. To study the performance and robustness of this concept, shaking table tests were performed at IZIIS, Skopje during the NATO-SfP project ISUbridge on a model deck bridge using controllable friction devices UHYDE-fbr to simulate the behavior of different passive devices including device failure. The tests showed that a stiff-ductile device in the link not only protects the piers from over-load, but also provides superior performance compared to viscous or soft base-isolation devices. Failure of such a device further reduced the demand on the piers but did not lead to excessive deck displacements or damage, thus confirming considerable seismic robustness for the HDS concept. This corroborates observations on the Bolu viaduct during the Kocaeli event. Unfortunately, HDS is often confused with Base- Isolation, which leads to the application of BI-devices, like LRBs and thus a reduction in performance and robustness. This is even more true for viscous devices, which are favored today.
高架道路的地震控制
过去的地震已经证明了甲板桥的脆弱性,这是高架道路上最常见的类型。特别是桥墩超载和桥段下降一直是一个令人担忧的问题。如果正确理解和应用地震控制概念,即使在超过设计极限的载荷下,也可以提供必要的物理力限制和减少位移。这里选择的概念是滞回装置系统,因为桥面桥梁通常在桥墩和桥面之间提供天然的地震联系。为了研究这一概念的性能和鲁棒性,在北约- sfp项目ISUbridge期间,在斯科普里IZIIS进行了振动台试验,在一个模型甲板桥上使用可控摩擦装置uhyd -fbr来模拟不同无源装置的行为,包括设备故障。试验表明,刚性韧性装置不仅可以保护桥墩不受过载的影响,而且与粘性或软基隔离装置相比,具有更好的性能。这种装置的故障进一步减少了对桥墩的需求,但不会导致甲板过度位移或损坏,从而证实了HDS概念的抗震稳健性。这证实了Kocaeli事件期间在Bolu高架桥上的观察结果。不幸的是,HDS经常与Base- Isolation混淆,这导致了bi器件(如LRBs)的应用,从而降低了性能和健壮性。对于粘性设备来说更是如此,这是今天最受欢迎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信