A look at the litigation in Covid-19 medical cases: Foreign case law

Hajrija Mujović
{"title":"A look at the litigation in Covid-19 medical cases: Foreign case law","authors":"Hajrija Mujović","doi":"10.5937/gakv95-35915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a look at court cases with a medical background that emerged as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of cases were started or finished as civil lawsuits. The cases are unique and they testify of disputes founded on different bases and forms of damages. They come from foreign case law, primarily from the US and European countries. The cases are different from one another and they usually concern access to healthcare, preventive measures, testing, emergency, and other conditions related to the work of specialist services, etc. The crisis that has arisen certainly cannot change the existing legal standards and other rules related to the responsibility of healthcare institutions and their employees. The crisis does not have that power, but it does bring certain specificities stemming from diverse situations. This is evidenced by the examples from the most recent case law. In order to ensure whether physicians and other medical staff have committed an error, the court must take into account the concrete working conditions of each of them in the context of the pandemic. Healthcare professionals are facing unusual risks related to the tasks they are being assigned. The existing legal regime of responsibility in healthcare provides some answers, but it is not certain that all the situations that have arisen from the healthcare crisis can be analyzed in the same way, especially due to the crisis situation and the dangers in which medical staff had to act.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv95-35915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a look at court cases with a medical background that emerged as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of cases were started or finished as civil lawsuits. The cases are unique and they testify of disputes founded on different bases and forms of damages. They come from foreign case law, primarily from the US and European countries. The cases are different from one another and they usually concern access to healthcare, preventive measures, testing, emergency, and other conditions related to the work of specialist services, etc. The crisis that has arisen certainly cannot change the existing legal standards and other rules related to the responsibility of healthcare institutions and their employees. The crisis does not have that power, but it does bring certain specificities stemming from diverse situations. This is evidenced by the examples from the most recent case law. In order to ensure whether physicians and other medical staff have committed an error, the court must take into account the concrete working conditions of each of them in the context of the pandemic. Healthcare professionals are facing unusual risks related to the tasks they are being assigned. The existing legal regime of responsibility in healthcare provides some answers, but it is not certain that all the situations that have arisen from the healthcare crisis can be analyzed in the same way, especially due to the crisis situation and the dangers in which medical staff had to act.
新冠肺炎医疗案件诉讼探析:国外判例法
本文介绍了因COVID-19大流行而出现的具有医学背景的法庭案件。大多数案件以民事诉讼的形式开始或结束。这些案例是独一无二的,它们证明了基于不同基础和不同形式的损害赔偿的纠纷。它们来自外国判例法,主要来自美国和欧洲国家。这些情况彼此不同,通常涉及获得保健、预防措施、检测、紧急情况和与专家服务工作有关的其他情况等。已经出现的危机当然不能改变现有的法律标准和与医疗机构及其雇员的责任有关的其他规则。这场危机没有这种力量,但它确实带来了来自不同情况的某些特殊性。最近的判例法的例子证明了这一点。为了确保医生和其他医务人员是否犯了错误,法院必须考虑到他们每个人在大流行病背景下的具体工作条件。医疗保健专业人员正面临着与他们被分配的任务相关的不寻常风险。现有的医疗责任法律制度提供了一些答案,但不能肯定的是,所有因医疗危机而产生的情况都可以用同样的方式进行分析,特别是由于危机情况和医务人员不得不采取行动的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信