{"title":"Ctio familiae erciscundae in the Gortyn law Code and the Law of the Twelve Tables","authors":"Milica Ristić","doi":"10.5937/gakv95-41438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author examines the relationship between Greek and Roman legal traditions through the analysis of actio familiae erciscundae - a Roman legal action seeking the partition of inheritance (division of family property), which can be found both in the Gortyn Law Code and the Law of the Twelve Tables. Several scientific research methods were used in the paper, with the comparative legal research method being the most represented one, due to the nature of the subject at hand. Using comparative legal research, the author will try to answer the question of whether the actio familiae erciscundae legal action can be marked as a kind of legal transplant and whether it is possible to come to some more general conclusions about the degree of legal transplantation between the two great ancient legal systems from this relationship. To provide the most comprehensive answer to this question, the historical method (historical approach to legal research) was also used in the paper to better understand the socio-political context of the given time, along with the linguistic method to correctly interpret the true sense and meaning of the actio familiae erciscundae action. Although, at first glance, the existence of this particular legal action in these two large ancient legal systems indicates certain similarities, a deeper analysis of the nature of family union and property in Roman and Greek society reveals some key differences presented in the paper, based on which the author concludes that the degree of Greek influence on Roman law is somewhat overrated and overemphasized","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv95-41438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, the author examines the relationship between Greek and Roman legal traditions through the analysis of actio familiae erciscundae - a Roman legal action seeking the partition of inheritance (division of family property), which can be found both in the Gortyn Law Code and the Law of the Twelve Tables. Several scientific research methods were used in the paper, with the comparative legal research method being the most represented one, due to the nature of the subject at hand. Using comparative legal research, the author will try to answer the question of whether the actio familiae erciscundae legal action can be marked as a kind of legal transplant and whether it is possible to come to some more general conclusions about the degree of legal transplantation between the two great ancient legal systems from this relationship. To provide the most comprehensive answer to this question, the historical method (historical approach to legal research) was also used in the paper to better understand the socio-political context of the given time, along with the linguistic method to correctly interpret the true sense and meaning of the actio familiae erciscundae action. Although, at first glance, the existence of this particular legal action in these two large ancient legal systems indicates certain similarities, a deeper analysis of the nature of family union and property in Roman and Greek society reveals some key differences presented in the paper, based on which the author concludes that the degree of Greek influence on Roman law is somewhat overrated and overemphasized
在本文中,作者通过分析在《戈廷法典》和《十二表法》中都能找到的一种寻求分割遗产(家庭财产的分割)的罗马法律诉讼——家庭行为(action familiae erciscundae)——来考察希腊和罗马法律传统之间的关系。本文采用了几种科学的研究方法,由于研究课题的性质,比较法学研究方法是最具代表性的一种。笔者将运用比较法学研究的方法,试图回答是否可以将家庭行为作为一种法律移植来标记的问题,以及是否有可能从这种关系中得出关于两大古代法系之间的法律移植程度的一些更笼统的结论。为了对这个问题提供最全面的答案,本文还使用了历史方法(法律研究的历史方法)来更好地理解给定时间的社会政治背景,同时使用语言学方法来正确解释“家庭行动”的真正意义和含义。虽然乍一看,这一特殊法律行为在这两大古代法律体系中的存在有一定的相似性,但对罗马和希腊社会中家庭联盟和财产性质的深入分析揭示了本文所呈现的一些关键差异,基于此,作者得出结论,希腊对罗马法的影响程度有些被高估和过分强调