Comparative analysis of methodologies for loss assessment after elementary disasters of countries in the region and the international community

S. Nedeljković, Željko Žugić, M. Marinković
{"title":"Comparative analysis of methodologies for loss assessment after elementary disasters of countries in the region and the international community","authors":"S. Nedeljković, Željko Žugić, M. Marinković","doi":"10.5937/fb_godisnjak0-38210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Republic of Serbia, the assessment of losses and damages after a natural disaster is based on a document adopted in 1987 during the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Although of exceptional quality in its structure and purpose, the Instruction on a Uniform Methodology for Assessing Damage from Natural Disasters has outlived its time and it is necessary to align the document with today's needs. The Government of the Republic of Serbia has formed a working group with the task of drafting a unique methodology for assessing damage from natural and other disasters, which is also in line with international standards and practice. In parallel with this activity, engineering associations and groups of experts are working on technical instructions for each of the natural hazards, which will be compatible with the unique methodology to be adopted by the Government of Serbia. The earthquake that hit the Republic of Croatia in 2020 pointed out a number of shortcomings in national documents, and then the international methodology \"Post Disaster Need Assessment\" was used to assess the damage. The paper presents the experiences of a team of experts from Serbia who paid an official visit to the Republic of Croatia after the earthquakes in Petrinja and Zagreb and gained significant experience from the field in damage assessment, as well as through cooperation with crisis headquarters formed after the earthquake.","PeriodicalId":33838,"journal":{"name":"Godisnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti","volume":"631 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Godisnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/fb_godisnjak0-38210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Republic of Serbia, the assessment of losses and damages after a natural disaster is based on a document adopted in 1987 during the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Although of exceptional quality in its structure and purpose, the Instruction on a Uniform Methodology for Assessing Damage from Natural Disasters has outlived its time and it is necessary to align the document with today's needs. The Government of the Republic of Serbia has formed a working group with the task of drafting a unique methodology for assessing damage from natural and other disasters, which is also in line with international standards and practice. In parallel with this activity, engineering associations and groups of experts are working on technical instructions for each of the natural hazards, which will be compatible with the unique methodology to be adopted by the Government of Serbia. The earthquake that hit the Republic of Croatia in 2020 pointed out a number of shortcomings in national documents, and then the international methodology "Post Disaster Need Assessment" was used to assess the damage. The paper presents the experiences of a team of experts from Serbia who paid an official visit to the Republic of Croatia after the earthquakes in Petrinja and Zagreb and gained significant experience from the field in damage assessment, as well as through cooperation with crisis headquarters formed after the earthquake.
区域各国与国际社会初级灾害后损失评估方法的比较分析
在塞尔维亚共和国,对自然灾害后损失和损害的评估是根据1987年南斯拉夫社会主义联邦共和国期间通过的一份文件。《关于评估自然灾害损害统一方法的指示》虽然在结构和目的上具有卓越的品质,但它已经过时,有必要使该文件与今天的需要保持一致。塞尔维亚共和国政府成立了一个工作组,其任务是起草一种独特的方法来评估自然灾害和其他灾害造成的损害,这种方法也符合国际标准和惯例。在进行这项活动的同时,工程协会和专家小组正在为每一种自然灾害编写技术说明,这些说明将与塞尔维亚政府将采用的独特方法相一致。2020年袭击克罗地亚共和国的地震指出了国家文件中的一些缺陷,然后使用国际方法“灾后需求评估”来评估损害。本文介绍了塞尔维亚专家小组在皮特林加和萨格勒布地震后对克罗地亚共和国进行正式访问的经验,并通过与地震后成立的危机总部的合作,从实地评估损失方面获得了重要经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信