Human security and state functioning in the context of pandemic and post-pandemic COVID-19

K. Lobanov, B. Selin
{"title":"Human security and state functioning in the context of pandemic and post-pandemic COVID-19","authors":"K. Lobanov, B. Selin","doi":"10.5937/fb_godisnjak0-35440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent pandemic COVID-19 has become inevitably a comprehensive crisis that challenges, like a war, the very state and society functioning. The situation of global instability and fear puts a logical question: who is responsible for vital things - security and safety of citizens? The traditional answer is the national state, as it constitutes its natural function. However, in last decades this postulate has only caused controversy and extended debates among academics and practitioners who support an idea of reducing the state role and loosing some of its functions in globalizing world in favour of civil society as well as transand supranational institutions. The principle purpose of this article is to reveal objective grounds for reetatization of public life and renationalization of international relations during the period of countering pandemic and at the post-pandemic stage. The authors are also endeavoring to join discussions concerning setting the limits of state powers expanding in a crisis, as well as the validity of the absolutism in etatistic, authoritarian and paternalistic practices as universal tools of crisis management. The problems under discussion are considered through the milieu of ensuring and preservation of human rights, freedoms and security of human communities.","PeriodicalId":33838,"journal":{"name":"Godisnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Godisnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/fb_godisnjak0-35440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent pandemic COVID-19 has become inevitably a comprehensive crisis that challenges, like a war, the very state and society functioning. The situation of global instability and fear puts a logical question: who is responsible for vital things - security and safety of citizens? The traditional answer is the national state, as it constitutes its natural function. However, in last decades this postulate has only caused controversy and extended debates among academics and practitioners who support an idea of reducing the state role and loosing some of its functions in globalizing world in favour of civil society as well as transand supranational institutions. The principle purpose of this article is to reveal objective grounds for reetatization of public life and renationalization of international relations during the period of countering pandemic and at the post-pandemic stage. The authors are also endeavoring to join discussions concerning setting the limits of state powers expanding in a crisis, as well as the validity of the absolutism in etatistic, authoritarian and paternalistic practices as universal tools of crisis management. The problems under discussion are considered through the milieu of ensuring and preservation of human rights, freedoms and security of human communities.
COVID-19大流行和大流行后背景下的人类安全和国家运作
最近的COVID-19大流行已不可避免地成为一场全面的危机,它像战争一样挑战着国家和社会的运作。全球不稳定和恐惧的局势提出了一个合乎逻辑的问题:谁负责至关重要的事情——公民的安全和保障?传统的答案是民族国家,因为它构成了它的自然功能。然而,在过去的几十年里,这一假设只引起了学术界和实践者之间的争议和扩展辩论,他们支持在全球化世界中减少国家角色并失去其某些功能的想法,以支持公民社会以及跨国家和超国家机构。本文的主要目的是揭示在防治大流行病期间和国际关系重新国家化以及在大流行病后阶段公共生活重新国家化的客观依据。作者还试图加入讨论,讨论如何在危机中限制国家权力的扩张,以及专制主义、专制主义和家长式做法作为危机管理的普遍工具的有效性。讨论中的问题是从确保和维护人权、自由和人类社会安全的角度来考虑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信