White Matter Hyperintensities on 1.5 and 3 Tesla Brain MRI in Healthy Individuals

C. Perri, M. Dwyer, N. Bergsland, C. Schirda, G. Poloni, D. Wack, J. L. Cox, Turi O. Dalaker, Laura Ranza, R. Zivadinov, Erik Saluste, S. Hussein, S. Bastianello
{"title":"White Matter Hyperintensities on 1.5 and 3 Tesla Brain MRI in Healthy Individuals","authors":"C. Perri, M. Dwyer, N. Bergsland, C. Schirda, G. Poloni, D. Wack, J. L. Cox, Turi O. Dalaker, Laura Ranza, R. Zivadinov, Erik Saluste, S. Hussein, S. Bastianello","doi":"10.5430/JBGC.V3N3P53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequent incidental findings in brains of asymptomatic healthy individuals (HI). The morphological and spatial distribution of these WMH between standard 1.5T scanners and increasingly available 3T scanners in a large population of HI in clinical routine settings has not been investigated. Objectives: To investigate the effect of changing from a 1.5T to a 3T MRI scanner on the number, volume and spatial distribution of WMH on brain MRI in a population of clinically HI. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three (53) HI were examined using T2 weighted sequences on both 1.5T and 3T within one week in a random order. The WMH were outlined semi-automatically by two blinded operators. Number and volume of WMH were calculated. Spatial lesion distribution was assessed using WMH probability maps (WMHPM). Paired-wise analysis examined the proportion of WMH not found on 1.5T and/or 3T. A posteriori unblinded analysis was conducted to examine the non-overlapping identifications of WMH between the 1.5T and 3T. Results : For paired-wise WMH analysis, 3T showed significantly higher WMH number and individual volume compared to 1.5 T ( p <0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that likelihood of missing WMH on 1.5T was significantly higher for smaller WMH. WMHPM revealed spatial WMH differences on 3T compared to 1.5T, with WMH more pronounced in the occipital regions with higher field strength. Conclusion: This study showed that use of higher magnetic field strength identified more WMH in healthy subjects with respect to both morphological and spatial characteristics. These WMH do not necessarily represent pathology; however, these findings should be taken into account in lesion segmentation on a 3T MRI and might suggest the use of universally accepted guidelines for lesions’ segmentation on higher magnetic field, especially when it is executed by different operators and/or centers.","PeriodicalId":89580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","volume":"3 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V3N3P53","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V3N3P53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background : White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequent incidental findings in brains of asymptomatic healthy individuals (HI). The morphological and spatial distribution of these WMH between standard 1.5T scanners and increasingly available 3T scanners in a large population of HI in clinical routine settings has not been investigated. Objectives: To investigate the effect of changing from a 1.5T to a 3T MRI scanner on the number, volume and spatial distribution of WMH on brain MRI in a population of clinically HI. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three (53) HI were examined using T2 weighted sequences on both 1.5T and 3T within one week in a random order. The WMH were outlined semi-automatically by two blinded operators. Number and volume of WMH were calculated. Spatial lesion distribution was assessed using WMH probability maps (WMHPM). Paired-wise analysis examined the proportion of WMH not found on 1.5T and/or 3T. A posteriori unblinded analysis was conducted to examine the non-overlapping identifications of WMH between the 1.5T and 3T. Results : For paired-wise WMH analysis, 3T showed significantly higher WMH number and individual volume compared to 1.5 T ( p <0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that likelihood of missing WMH on 1.5T was significantly higher for smaller WMH. WMHPM revealed spatial WMH differences on 3T compared to 1.5T, with WMH more pronounced in the occipital regions with higher field strength. Conclusion: This study showed that use of higher magnetic field strength identified more WMH in healthy subjects with respect to both morphological and spatial characteristics. These WMH do not necessarily represent pathology; however, these findings should be taken into account in lesion segmentation on a 3T MRI and might suggest the use of universally accepted guidelines for lesions’ segmentation on higher magnetic field, especially when it is executed by different operators and/or centers.
正常人1.5和3特斯拉脑MRI白质高信号
背景:t2加权磁共振成像(MRI)上的白质高信号(WMH)是无症状健康人(HI)大脑中常见的偶然发现。在临床常规设置的大量HI人群中,这些WMH在标准1.5T扫描仪和日益可用的3T扫描仪之间的形态学和空间分布尚未进行研究。目的:探讨从1.5T到3T MRI扫描仪对临床HI人群脑MRI WMH数量、体积和空间分布的影响。材料与方法:采用T2加权序列对53例HI患者进行1周内1.5T和3T随机排序检测。WMH由两名盲操作人员半自动勾画。计算WMH的数量和体积。采用WMH概率图(WMHPM)评估病灶的空间分布。配对分析检查了1.5T和/或3T未发现WMH的比例。进行了后验非盲法分析,以检查1.5T和3T之间WMH的非重叠鉴定。结果:配对WMH分析,3T组WMH数和个体体积显著高于1.5 T组(p <0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,在1.5T时,WMH越小,缺失WMH的可能性越高。与1.5T相比,3T时WMHPM显示出WMH的空间差异,其中枕区WMH在场强较高的区域更为明显。结论:本研究表明,使用较高的磁场强度,健康受试者在形态和空间特征方面都能识别出更多的WMH。这些WMH不一定代表病理;然而,在3T MRI的病变分割中,这些发现应该被考虑在内,并可能建议使用普遍接受的指南来分割高磁场下的病变,特别是当它由不同的操作员和/或中心执行时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信