Modified direct orthodontic bonding metod: Effectiveness in orthodontic therapy: A retrospective clinical study

Q4 Dentistry
Vladimir D. Mitić, Suzana Ilić, Stefan Jovanović, Ivana N. Stoiljković
{"title":"Modified direct orthodontic bonding metod: Effectiveness in orthodontic therapy: A retrospective clinical study","authors":"Vladimir D. Mitić, Suzana Ilić, Stefan Jovanović, Ivana N. Stoiljković","doi":"10.5937/asn2286441m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study was to determine the percentage of bond failures of placed brackets with a modified direct method in patients of both genders, different ages and malocclusion types during 12 months of initial bonding. Material and Methods: The retrospective clinical study covered the period from November 2019 to December 2022 and included thirty patients with an average age of 17.07±5.35 8 males,(average age 18.77±7.87), and 22 females, (average age 16.45±4.17) who met the criteria. A total of 600 brackets with a 0.022\" slot size (Mini Sprint ® , Forestadent, Germany) were placed by a modified direct method using thin paste adhesive (Reliance Light Bond™, Itasca, USA) by one operator. The observation of bond failures lasted 12 months. Results: The total number of bond failures was 10 (1.67%), where eight patients (26,7%) experienced unwanted debonding. The number of failed brackets in relation to age and malocclusion did not show statistical significance. There was a clinical difference between the genders, in 18.2% of women and in 50% of men. Statistical significance in number of failed brackets was not significant (HR=0.343; 95% CI: 0.084-1.394; p=0.135). Conclusion: The modified direct bonding method did not show differences at the level of age, gender and type of malocclusion, but it can be one of the methods of choice during direct bonding.","PeriodicalId":39229,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Naissi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Naissi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/asn2286441m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the percentage of bond failures of placed brackets with a modified direct method in patients of both genders, different ages and malocclusion types during 12 months of initial bonding. Material and Methods: The retrospective clinical study covered the period from November 2019 to December 2022 and included thirty patients with an average age of 17.07±5.35 8 males,(average age 18.77±7.87), and 22 females, (average age 16.45±4.17) who met the criteria. A total of 600 brackets with a 0.022" slot size (Mini Sprint ® , Forestadent, Germany) were placed by a modified direct method using thin paste adhesive (Reliance Light Bond™, Itasca, USA) by one operator. The observation of bond failures lasted 12 months. Results: The total number of bond failures was 10 (1.67%), where eight patients (26,7%) experienced unwanted debonding. The number of failed brackets in relation to age and malocclusion did not show statistical significance. There was a clinical difference between the genders, in 18.2% of women and in 50% of men. Statistical significance in number of failed brackets was not significant (HR=0.343; 95% CI: 0.084-1.394; p=0.135). Conclusion: The modified direct bonding method did not show differences at the level of age, gender and type of malocclusion, but it can be one of the methods of choice during direct bonding.
改良直接正畸粘接法:在正畸治疗中的有效性:回顾性临床研究
背景:本研究的目的是测定不同性别、不同年龄、不同错颌类型的患者在初始粘接的12个月内,用改良的直接法对放置的托槽进行粘接失败的百分比。材料与方法:回顾性临床研究时间为2019年11月至2022年12月,纳入符合标准的30例患者,平均年龄17.07±5.35岁,男性8例(平均年龄18.77±7.87),女性22例(平均年龄16.45±4.17)。共有600个凹槽尺寸为0.022英寸的托架(Mini Sprint®,Forestadent,德国)由一家运营商使用薄膏状粘合剂(Reliance Light Bond™,Itasca,美国),通过改进的直接方法放置。债券违约的观察持续了12个月。结果:粘接失败10例(1.67%),其中8例(26.7%)出现不必要的脱粘。牙槽失败数与年龄、错颌的关系无统计学意义。男女之间存在临床差异,女性为18.2%,男性为50%。失效托槽数差异无统计学意义(HR=0.343;95% ci: 0.084-1.394;p = 0.135)。结论:改良后的直接粘接方法在年龄、性别、错牙合类型等方面均无差异,可作为直接粘接的首选方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Naissi
Acta Stomatologica Naissi Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信