Patients' and psychiatrists' stance on the current state of pharmacological depression treatment in Serbia and prospects of introduction of personalized pharmacotherapy and its potential effects

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
A. Jeremić, F. Milosavljević, A. Opanković, M. Jukic
{"title":"Patients' and psychiatrists' stance on the current state of pharmacological depression treatment in Serbia and prospects of introduction of personalized pharmacotherapy and its potential effects","authors":"A. Jeremić, F. Milosavljević, A. Opanković, M. Jukic","doi":"10.5937/arhfarm72-37613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of antidepressants has been steadily increasing. Even though the amount of evidence on the usefulness of personalized drug dosing in depression treatment is growing, there is still resistance and skepticism among physicians and regulators regarding the implementation of CYP450 genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatric clinical practice. The aim of this study was to quantify the opinions of psychiatrists and patients from three large psychiatric clinics in Belgrade, Serbia, and to examine what requirements need to be met to make changes in clinical guidelines or recommendations. All participants completed an anonymous questionnaire that was developed at the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade. Fourteen practicing psychiatrists and 30 patients currently treated for depression completed the questionnaire. Distributions of opinion scores were compared between the psychiatrists and patients upon the visual inspection of the violin plots. Our results show that psychiatrists predominantly have a positive opinion on personalized dosing in psychiatry and that patients are most likely to comply with new approaches in depression pharmacotherapy. However, due to the long time needed for regulatory change, it is very unlikely that personalized dosing would be rapidly implemented in clinical practice, even if adequate evidence was to emerge.","PeriodicalId":39173,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm72-37613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of antidepressants has been steadily increasing. Even though the amount of evidence on the usefulness of personalized drug dosing in depression treatment is growing, there is still resistance and skepticism among physicians and regulators regarding the implementation of CYP450 genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatric clinical practice. The aim of this study was to quantify the opinions of psychiatrists and patients from three large psychiatric clinics in Belgrade, Serbia, and to examine what requirements need to be met to make changes in clinical guidelines or recommendations. All participants completed an anonymous questionnaire that was developed at the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade. Fourteen practicing psychiatrists and 30 patients currently treated for depression completed the questionnaire. Distributions of opinion scores were compared between the psychiatrists and patients upon the visual inspection of the violin plots. Our results show that psychiatrists predominantly have a positive opinion on personalized dosing in psychiatry and that patients are most likely to comply with new approaches in depression pharmacotherapy. However, due to the long time needed for regulatory change, it is very unlikely that personalized dosing would be rapidly implemented in clinical practice, even if adequate evidence was to emerge.
患者和精神科医生对塞尔维亚抑郁症药物治疗现状的立场,以及引入个性化药物治疗的前景及其潜在效果
抗抑郁药的使用一直在稳步增加。尽管个性化药物剂量在抑郁症治疗中有用的证据越来越多,但在医生和监管机构中,对于在精神病学临床实践中实施CYP450基因分型和治疗药物监测,仍然存在阻力和怀疑。本研究的目的是量化来自塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德三家大型精神病诊所的精神科医生和患者的意见,并检查需要满足哪些要求才能改变临床指南或建议。所有参与者都填写了一份由贝尔格莱德大学药学院编制的匿名问卷。14名执业精神科医生和30名正在接受抑郁症治疗的患者完成了问卷调查。比较了精神科医生和患者在小提琴情节的视觉检查上的意见得分的分布。我们的研究结果显示,精神科医生主要对精神病学的个性化剂量持积极态度,患者最有可能遵守抑郁症药物治疗的新方法。然而,由于监管改革需要很长时间,即使有足够的证据,个性化给药也不太可能在临床实践中迅速实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arhiv za Farmaciju
Arhiv za Farmaciju Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信